aggienaut: (asucd)
[personal profile] aggienaut

The subject on all your minds: At this point the electoral college results are 254 Bush, 252 Kerry (its 6:30 in the morning). With 270 needed of course for election seems to me things are shockingly close at this point. Everyone is saying Bush has won so I'm guessing the remaining locations are expected to side with him though? Anyway if you can depart from dwelling on the election for a few minutes, its not the subject of this entry, and I'd like your attention because I'm going to be serious here about something real and frightenening thats not the election.


The Conspiracy at UC Davis
   ASUCD President Kalen Gallagher recently announced to our Justice Daniel Raff that he opposes all of our proposed judicial reforms, in stark contrast to what he'd told Justice Raff the week before and myself sometime before that. This latest hair-pin turn of policy, combined with his recent inexplicable veto of legislation that would have made it harder to raise student fees and had been supported by an "overwhelming majority" of the ASUCD Senate leaves me with the strong feeling that President Gallagher is no longer making his own decisions.
   A certain former commission chair has been telling me about a secret organization called Swords and Sandals, which allegedly includes members of the Administration up to and including the Chancellor, and higher-ups in student government. Basically the theory is that members of S&S gather in secret and talk about how they want to manipulate campus politics and other things within their influence, presumably at the expense of actual student interests (ie it would be their policy to oppose making it harder to raise student fees).
   Now I find malevolent secret societies a fun thing to speculate upon in a non-serious manner. I mean, I may deny it later when I'm not being so serious, but I am very close to the two non-serious campus secret societies (ie they invite me on their various expeditions but I never go), Campus Crusade for Chaos & Confusion and Students for an Orwellian Society. But when it comes to actually believing conspiracy theories I usually draw the line.
   before our court meeting, in informal discussion regarding President Gallagher's inexplicable behavior, I mentioned S&S. One justice responded that he'd heard of it before, and another proceeded to tell a story about his former roommate Brian McInnis.

   Before I get into the story of Brian McInnis, however, I want to further lay out the background evidence of S&S's existence. I did a search on google for several combinations of the words "swords," "sandals," "ASUCD," "Davis," and "UC Davis" and came up with three results. (1) UC Davis provost Virginia Hinshaw in a listing of "major / keynote presentations" she has done lists "Swords and Sandals, Davis, CA" in 2002 (source). (2) A page about UC Davis facility reservation policies lists under policy 270-16 "Occasional fund-raising on University property is permitted for the following groups with the prior approval of the Director of CEVS. Funds raised must be donated to or used by a service, charitable, or education organization registered with the IRS. (A) Campus Interest Groups (ex. Swords and Sandals); (B) Non-University Organizations (ex. Davis Chamber of Commerce)" (source)
   Finally the only other reference to the organization that I could find anywhere on the web is (3)in a humorous article written for the "UC Davis Magazine" (itself basically a ploy to get alumni to donate wads of cash) six years ago. I recommend reading the article if you've got a minute and are interested in some other unanswered questions about Davis (notably a cal trans conspiracy theory).

   So: Brian McInnis. I haven't been following his odious ASUCD career too closely and in general I don't pay much attention to the "advocacy units" but I believe he originated somewhere in either "City / County Affairs" or "State & National Affairs." There very early on and from a position of relative unimportance he made his mark by ingratiating himself to city council members at the expense of ASUCD (I believe telling them bad things about the mentality of the rest of ASUCD so that they'd see him as "their man" in ASUCD, which was naturally detrimental to the relationship of the rest of ASUCD with the city). Other early impressions were that he was the most manipulative and generally smarmy individual since ASUCD Senator Lee Weissman (now a used car salesman, no joke). Anyway I believe he was eventually put in charge of State & Nat'l Affairs (under the Gallagher administration incidently, which I thought at the time was unexpected because the impression I was under was that he was universally hated), and was the author of a record number of resolutions expressing endorsement for political candidates and propositions (all of which, it turns out, were illegal and hence ASUCD's current IRS investigation). Later on however, a new position was created specifically for McInnis, the name of which unfortunately currently escapes me, which basically puts BOTH City/County & State & Nat'l under him, giving him an unprecedented amount of authority. This is his current position.
   McInnis is the exact opposite of someone one would want representing their organization to outside parties. He falls over himself in his rush to ingratiate himself to any political figure outside of ASUCD. Instead of taking ASUCD issues to these external figures he directly takes on whatever issue THEY want and advocates it within ASUCD. Altogether he is the ideal tool of S&S, and that relationship would explain his rise to power in the face of general loathing from student government members.

   As to President Gallagher, he's not eager to sell out ASUCD like McInnis is, but I think he's extremely ambitious and somewhat unscrupulous. I won't subject you with a second ASUCD biography in this entry but to highlight Gallagher's ambition I'd like to note that, former president of his HS' ASB, he emailed all the then-current ASUCD senators the summer before he first arrived at Davis. I met him on my first day here a few days before school started and he handed me his business card. He didn't even have a job but he had a business card. He ran for senate his first quarter (as did I - we're the same year) on Lee Weissman's Untie Unite slate (Weissman later related that Gallagher had told him "you can have me on your slate, or not, but either way I'm going to run and I'm going to win").
   I have never seen Gallagher get behind an issue except for the sake of getting behind an issue (as opposed to actually believing in the issue). As such S&S has exactly as much influence over him as he perceives it to be in his aspiring political interests to cooperate with them; and I think they recently made him a tantalizing offer.

   Anyway, if you've read all the above I really appreciate it. I needed to get this conspiracy off my chest as it were. I hope you understood all that, I tried to make it understandable to those not familiar with the inner workings of UC Davis or ASUCD. If anyone here has anything further to share on the subject of Swords and Sandals I'd be greatly appreciative.


PS: Its 8:30am now and apparently Kerry just informed Bush that he will concede at 1pm EST (10am here?). You've probably heard that already, but if you're hearing it here first, EMOSNAIL is proud to be on the cutting edge of the news.


This entry rated: PG (friends only)

Date: 2004-11-03 10:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thiswallflower.livejournal.com
Swords and Sandals brings me images of angry hippies, complete with ponchos, running amuck with weapons. It's hard to take life seriously when your president cannot say nuclear and your university president is behind controlled by violent free range people.

It would make for a lovely film.

Date: 2004-11-03 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
violent free range NUCLEAR people mind you, UC Davis does in fact have a nuclear reactor, what ho!

Date: 2004-11-03 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thiswallflower.livejournal.com
is it too early to start building a bomb shelter?

Date: 2004-11-03 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
indeed Gena. You just need to learn to embrace the new old administration, c'mon, say it with me: "four more wars, four more wars, four more wars..."

Date: 2004-11-03 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] citizene.livejournal.com
I've heard "Swords and Sandals" mentioned once before, but I don't remember where. Maybe your journal, if you've mentioned it. I dunno. This kind of reminds me of that phase the governor went through where he vetoed everything in sight, good or bad. Nihilism in government. I figured he was just cracking under the pressure of the job at the time -- sort of, that's it, time out for everyone until Arnie gets his bubble bath.

A 9-1-2 vote is pretty forceful, but I would have liked to amend the initiative a little more if there was a chance. Why 67 percent? I tried to ask once where a reasonable cutoff would be, given the history of student voting on fee-based initiatives, and I couldn't get an answer. It seems like the amendment was drafted with the reasoning that two-thirds is the next tick up from one-half, and that's abotu how we do things in other parts of government, but 67 is still an arbitrary percentage, round numbers or no. Nonetheless, I don't have any trouble believing that Kalen has a touch of the evil in him, either.

Date: 2004-11-03 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
I haven't mentioned Swords and Sandals before, I didn't give the theory any real weight until recently

I think the bottem line is that I know Kalen and Kalen has no opinions of his own. Him coming up with strong opinions recently from no apparent source is highly suspicious considering that.


60% or 65% would be acceptable to me. The fact of the matter is that nearly everything passes at the fifty percent mark and as such things are put on the ballot knowing they'll get passed regardless and its just well.. lame. When the measures about the Court first came up in 2001, having no idea I'd ever actually be on the Court, I had a strong mind to try to reverse them next election just to prove that (A) they were ridiculous and (B) people would vote for two contradictory things in subsequent elections because they were just blindly voting yes.

Date: 2004-11-03 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sivart13.livejournal.com
I really appreciate you posting this. I've always thought there was something suspicious about that Gallagher character; I think he emits Douchebag waves or something.

Date: 2004-11-03 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emosnail.livejournal.com
In my opinion its not so much that he's got malevolence so much as a complete absense of scruples.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 05:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »