aggienaut: (Default)

   The other day I watched a movie I've been wanting to watch for awhile, Punk's Dead. Which is the sequel to SLC Punk.

SLC Punk - Let us begin by talking about the original. I saw this movie in 1999 or 2000 and it literally changed my life. The movie is about punks in Salt Lake City, and more generally, it is about the punk rock movement in general, what it means to be a punk and such. It's not a documentary, though sometimes it adopts an overtly mock-documentary style for a scene or two. The story is beautifully scripted to balance between mockumentary and the story arcs of the characters involved. The acting is great, the characters all memorable and interesting. Through its storyline it really gets at the essence of of punkishness in a way that an essay about it or serious documentary just couldn't.
   And basically it immediately launched my friends and I into punkishness ourselves. Previous to the movie we were nondescript teenagers wearing jeans and forgettable t-shirts, with no particular music taste. Within months we were wearing spiked (dickies) jackets, band shirts (usually mostly black), and well in the case of my friends dickies shorts and black converse though I personally rebelled at being quite THAT much in a form of uniform. It wasn't all pretense, we did find we did really like the music (I personally drifted more towards the Irish-punk of Flogging Molly, Dropkick Murphy's etc), and going to shows was always fun. I definitely felt very much like we were all secretly "posers," and early on wrote "POSER" really big with black acryllic paint across a white t-shirt and would wear it to punk shows, I enjoyed the irony of it looking like a punk thing to do but I was I felt secretly telling on myself.



   For years I felt like I was secretly a poser at being a punk more or less until I realized I was drifting into post-punk and in retrospect I had totally been a punk. And I think really it's not as embarrassing as I thought it was to be so inspired by a movie. One has to get into it somehow, if not from the movie it would probably be by what, knowing some older punkish kids at school and idolizing them and getting into it that way. No yeah no we saw a movie that thoroughly laid out what the movement was all about and we looked at eachother and said fuck yeah that seems rad. And it was.

   But then, like I said there's this even harder to define thing that is "post-punk" which is kind of a combination of starting to feel like you're getting too old for it and you've been rebelling against society enough and questioning everything enough that you come full circle and question what you're questioning and just, its complicated and vaguely zen.
   And so when I discovered there was a sequel to SLC Punk that was made 17 years after the original I was excited and naturally assumed it would address this kind of thing, how are all our main characters adapting their formerly punk rock rebellious worldviews to having careers in the real world?
Punk's Dead - Well, in short, it wasn't really that and it was very disappointing. It focuses on some characters who were very minor characters in the original (guess they couldn't get the original protagonist) and some new characters. Basically the sort of gothy but very uptight son of one of the original movie's main characters and two friends of his. The plot is practically as simple as can be -- a girl breaks this kid's heart so he goes on a roadtrip with two friends to go see a band. During the trip he gets drunk and does drugs and loosens up a bit. The legacy characters from the original meanwhile spend a lot of time just talking about how conerned they are for him. In the end spoiler alert he has a sudden romance with his female friend that feels supreeemeely forced as they didn't have chemistry and seem very unlikely. The only philosophizing that goes on is just a bit of parroting of some things said in the original but in this case it comes across as unoriginal and not supported in context. In short the whole movie was very disappointing. I give it a D. But I definitely receommend the original as an A+++ movie you neeed to see.


And here's a better picture of the mohawk I had. I absolutely unreservedly do not regret having the mohawk, it was awesome and I loved the way it effected how people treated me (either like I was dangerously deranged or among any punk-inclined person instant friendliness)

aggienaut: (Default)

July 18th, 22:54 - I was writing that last entry starting while waiting at the gate and finishing literally as we began to taxi down the runway. So it was a bit rushed at the end and didn't include some pictures I've since added.

   Flight was with United, direct from LAX to Sydney. It looks like they'er building a monorail or at least light rail connection at LAX, that would be pretty rad if they actually connect it to the national rail network. I was surprised there was no passport control to leave the United States through the United terminal. Flight was mostly full, but got lucky, had the window seat with an empty seat next to me! 40ish woman on the aisle and I high fived when they closed the door and the seat between us was still empty. Place to dump all our junk! / I totally made use of sticking my feet under the seat in front of that seat for added room. Dinner was a cheeseburger, which I thought lol how very American of United, but it was actually very good. Seatmate remarked on it being surprisingly good. She was a paramedic from Florida, headed to Australia for the women's world cup, was going to potentially visit whichever cities the team she was following (USA?) was playing in.

In Flight Movie Reviews
The D&D Movie - you know, it was actually quite good. I'd heard it was good, and I'd gotten in to D&D the other year, but I was put off from seeing it any sooner because that actor Chris Pine seems extremely hateable to me. I just have this uncontrollable loathing for him. He looks so punchable. I can't even say his acting was bad, I just can't get past how much I hate his appearance. Anyway, I think part of what made this movie so good is that, very much like D&D characters, almost formulaically so, they gave each of the main characters as basic backstory-motivation. I say almost formuliacally because it really seemed like each one had the paragraph one writes when creating a character, almost down to being like the pre-written suggested ones, but it totally worked in the movie and it had me thinking that most movies don't really bother to do that with anyone other than the one most main protagonist. And each of the characters had a meaningful character development story arc. Plot was interesting and had a lot of clever references to D&D things without seeming like it was awkwardly trying to jam them in or in danger of boring people who weren't familiar with the game. In fact I think someone unfamiliar with the game would enjoy it perfectly well purely on its merits as a fantasy movie. I might have given it an A if it weren't for Chris Pine but god I hate him. B+

Avatar: Way of the Water - So the original Avatar didn't exactly have a mind blowing plot, everyone roundly made fun of it for being "dances with wolves with smurfs." Well this one somehow had a worse plot. At the end of the previous one the bad human colonists have to leave the planet Pandora. This one establishes that after (10 years?) another human expediiton arrived with greater force and established a bridgehead on the planet called... Bridgehead City. Our protagonist has been leading guerilla partisan warfare against these colonists, which has been successul in being a huge nuisance to them but not stopping them. It's now (5?) years after the return of the humans. Okay here's where it gets mind bendingly dumb. The colonial authorities want to kill Protagonistface because he's the leader of the resistence, so what does he do? He stops fighting, but leaves his tribe because he fears the colonials will strike his people, and he joins some other tribe, which immediately becomes the target of colonial strikes. Like, what did that accomplish other than the obviously intended meta goal of changing to an ocean based setting? But in universe, why would he stop fighting? Why would the colonials necessarily know where he specifically is? How would he justify really making some other tribe the target for persecution, considering he's supposed to be such a Good Guy and just causing a different innocent tribe to suffer instead of your own doesn't seem like good guy behavior.
   None of this is really spoilers btw, its pretty much established as exposition as soon as they can. And then what I thought was really lame is they have the exact same guy as the bad guy. They're just like "lol look we cloned him before he died!" I think that's a pretty piss poor excuse just to make the same movie again in a different setting. And then, spoiler alert (but really its too lame to be much of a spoiler) they make it clear that the apparently defeated main antagonist has survived, clearly setting up to have him once again reprise the same role (groan) in a third installment. I give this movie a C-, it would be less but I do like all the cool CGI animals they've made and some of the humantech vehicles too.

Banshees of Inisherin - The official plot summary of this movie is "Two lifelong friends find themselves at an impasse when one abruptly ends their relationship." Which doesn't actually sound that exciting but the movie is actually very amusing. There's a subtle humor to almost every line and it moves along quite well. Unfortunately I only started the movie near the end of the flight and we reached the gate when I had just about exactly half an hour left of the movie. Now I'm quite wrapped up in wanting to know how they resolve their plot arcs! It's apparently on Disney+ but I was getting Disney+ through my former roommmate Trent and it appears he has changed his password. And after he moved out he started being kind of a dick to everyone and only hanging out with his 18 yr old girlfriend so I'm not terribly inclined to beg him to give me his new Disneyplus password. Guess I'll need to fly on United again so I can finish the movie. (But note to self its literally on the 30 min remaining mark I left off!) A-

/End In Flight Movie Reviews

   At Sydney in the baggage claim I had some confusion, because as I had checked my checked luggage the handler had said it would go through all the way to Melbourne and the luggage tag I was given reflected that, indicated pick up at MEL, but conventional wisdom would be that I'd have to retrieve my luggage on arrival from international flight, go through biosecurity/customs, and recheck for domestic, and an employee I asked said yes I would have to collect it here. Aggravating things was the fact that it continued to not come out onto the belt until I was really starting to wonder if it wasn't coming out here at all and had indeed continued on automatically. But then finally it came out. By now I had an hour to catch my connecting flight (only half an hour till boarding!), deja vu of the JFK debacle!
   Emerging from international arrivals it was entirely unclear where to go for my domestic flight and I couldn't even find an airport employee, until I asked someone at a currency exchange desk who pointed me in the right direction for the inter-terminal shuttle. Arriving there a airport staffmember was advising us that if we had a tight connection to make it would be faster to take the train, so I rain in the direction indicated, down the two flights of stairs to the subway. Train came within a minute (unlike th NYC JFK train that took ten minutes to arrive!), at this point it was only about half an hour to departure (8:30) and I was afraid they wouldnt' check me in but they did, got through security and arrived at the gate just in time to board the plane.

   Once again had a window seat with an empty middle seat behind me. This time the woman in the aisle seat was matronly and threw her purse into the middle seat in what felt like an unfriendly hostile manner. We never spoke. Looking out the windows as we flew over the mountains of the Great Dividing Range there was an impressive amount of snow.



   Stepping out of hte Melbourne airport it was indeed coold! 9c (48f) "feels like 4" (39f). I had just missed the earlier Gull shuttle bus to Melbourne, would have to wait an hour for the next (which was the one I had expected to catch anyway). Changed into some more layers in the restroom while waiting. Bossman picked me up from the shuttle stop in Geelong, filled me in on some of shenanigans that had occurred while I was gone, sounds like an eventful two months!
   Kind of expected the car to need to be jumped but it started right up. Went and got lunch at the schnitzel-wrap place nad then some groceries since I obviously have no perishables from before I left. Then headed home.
   Just on the edge of my village I pass a police car, which I see promptly do a u-turn behind me. Which isn't a normal place to do so so I was bracing myself for what came next which was the reds and blues behind me. Remember my car? Having collided with a cow on the road? Well, I was waiting for their insurance to pay me for my damages, finally finally after taking seemingly forever (literally 7 months) they emailed me while I was in Africa saying they (the insurance company) found their client was not at fault because the fences were in good order and a cow jumping over a fence is an "act of god." I responded by sending the photo of the numerous cows on the road, and reminder that the farmer had admitted to owning the cow I hit, and they responded that it was unprovable that those other cows were also the farmers, which in my opinion stretched credulity beyond reason. So now that I'm back I've made an appointment with a lawyer to sue them for the damages. But long story short my car has not been repaired yet.
   The copper, who it turns out is the local Birregurra copper, was relatively friendly, said he wasn't going to ticket me or condemn my car with a "canary" (yellow ticket making a car officially unroadworthy), but he would if he saw me on the road with it again. Soo I was going to go to work tomorrow but I think I'll instead take the day to buy another car. As I've mentioned before I hate hate hate hate hate shoppinig for cars. But I think, though I innately feel like one "should" shop all around for the best car, I'm literally going to buy the first reasonably priced reasonable car I find because did I mention I absolutely haaaaate shopping for cars?
   Anyway, welcome home ey?

   Arrived home at 15:45 local time, which I think would have been 22:45 July 19th back in California, ie right on about 24 hours after my flight took off from LAX.

   My neighbor who i left my house key with wasn't home just yet, which presented a bit of a pickle. But weirdly, considering I recall having a hard time finding a house key to lock the house with at all before I left, on this occasion I went to where I felt my spare key should be and lo there was a key tehre that opened the house. I don't know why I couldn't find that key before I left? Or maybe I knowingly put it there at the time in addition to giving one to my neighbor and have simply forgotten.
   Anyway, the end.

aggienaut: (Default)

   Let us pick up directly from where we left off, at the airport gate to leave Melbourne, and stressed about whether or not I'd be able to get in to Guinea due to accidentally failing to have my yellow fever certificate with me.

   Sitting nearby in the waiting area was what appeared to be a couple of African descent with their 4 year old daughter, and the precocious little girl was telling another woman "I'm going to Africa!" So I thought I'd be so bold as to ask the man where in Africa they were going.
   "Conakry Guinea"
   "Me toooo!"
   We immediately began comparing notes on the trip to Guinea (there's direct flights from Dubai now!), how things are there, etc. They turned out to be extremely friendly. Not a couple as it happens. The man (Sam) was traveling with his wife's best friend and the latter's daughter.

   Had an aisle seat beside an older caucasian couple. It would be my assumption they're just doing something boring like being on a vacation to Rome but last year when I finally talked to my older caucasian seatmate three quarters of the way through the flight it turned out she was on her way to Lagos Nigeria for a development project. So with that in mind this time I greeted my seatmates as soon as we were seated. They were on their way to Rome for vacation.

In Flight Movie Reviews
Woman King - This movie is about the legendary female warriors of the Dahomey kingdrom in West Africa in or around 1823. The plot is kind of a bit full of ahistorical fluff -- in the movie the Dahomey are adamandtly opposed to the slave trade and fighting to end it when in reality the Dahomey under that specific king tremendously _increased_ their participation in the slave trade and it was only under pressure from England that they eventually moved away from it. But other than that it's a fun movie and it's good to see a hollywood movie set West Africa actually striving to do serious justice to the culture rather than have it be some anarchic backwater of simple "natives." One review describes it as "Braveheart with black women" and that seems accurate.
   Also noteworthy that John Boyega, who played the Dahomey king, is ethnically Yoruba, ie, of the people who are portrayed as his enemies here. And it was interesting to me because the Yoruba history I'd read as background for the historical bits of my book as generally from the Oyo / Yoruba perspective, so funny for me as well for them to be cast as the villians. Also, as portrayed here, they come across more like their own enemies the Sokoto Caliphate horsemen than as themselves.
   I give it an A-, it was enjoyable and my only quibbles are with their historical liberties.

The Legion - This movie about a Roman scout escaping an encircled Roman camp and fleeing across the Armenian wilderness pursued by two enemies in order to go ask for help from another Roman general was extremely unimpressive. It felt like I was watching a student film project made by about half a dozen film students (I'm surprised to read now there's as many as sixteen actors in it). I didn't even try not to fall asleep during it and I don't think I missed anything. Looks like the professional reviewers pretty well skewered it too. F

Unknown Richard the Lionhearted Movie Kingslayer - then I tried to watch some Richard the Lionhearted movie that also didn't seem like it was proceeding very promisingly and I was at my limit for bad movies so just went to sleep. Googling it now I find it has 4/10 stars on IMDB, and the first result besides that is a google auto generated "People Often Ask: Is Kingslayer a good movie?" with the answer "Kingslayer is a poorly written, poorly acted, poorly directed film where the plot makes as little sense as why John Rhys-Davies agreed to associate himself with it." sooo I think my initial impression was probably correct and I'm going to go ahead and label it with the F
End Movie Interlude

   Arrived at 5:20am local time in Dubai, which would have been 10:20am in Melbourne, I guess making it only a 13 hour flight.
   Met up with my Guinean friends, who of course were making the same connection as I. Because I'm almost always traveling alone it's kind of novel and fun for me to feel like I'm traveling "with" people and they made me feel like I was part of their little group. In fact I had a very unusually social time in the airport because then a Muslim man approached us, he couldn't speak English but it was clear he couldn't figure out where his flight's gate was so I went off with him in search of his proper gate until he found some Arabic speaking people to help him. Anyway took off about two hours later.



   Flight would be bound for Dakar after Conakry and wasn't full. I was kind of anticipating most of the passenger would be onward bound to Dakar but (spoiler alert) it seemed like roughtly half got off in Conakry in the end. I would have had a seatmate but the cheeky woman moved to an unoccupied seat in the front row of the section, which I'd just heard the flight attendant tell someone else they'd have to pay $100 if they wanted to upgrade to it ahaha. So I had the aisle seat, empty seat beside me and a young man by the window spoke no known language (which is to say not English or French), and didn't deplane in Conakry.
   As the flight was all day time, and had the same set of movies of which I'd already seen all the ones I wanted to watch, I just read my book(s).

In Flight Book Reviews
In Trouble Again by Redmond O'Hanlon -- I had greatly enjoyed reading his later book set in the Congo, and in this one he is traveling by boat through the Venezuelan Amazon. Again I loved his mix of well portrayed characters, beautiful descriptions, and interesting all around setting, observations of natural history, etc. I think I slightly preferred Congo Journey for its tighter Heart of Darkness style plot arc of descent into near insanity, but no complaints about this book, I quite liked it. Finished the book ... great I haven't even arrive yet and finished one of the two books I brought with me. And I like this book too much to discard it, want to keep it on my shelf / loan it to other people, so guess I'll be carting it around now.

Into the Heart of Borneo by Redmon O'Hanlon -- Started this earlier book by the same author. In this one he is in 1983 making his first of what as we know would later be several ambitious expeditions. I'm only a few chapters in and I can tell his writing at this early stage is much less evolved than it would later be. He seems to be hurrying along in his prose, and makes some jokes I felt rather fell flat, but that's not to say it's a bad book at all. In fact it's kind of fun to have witnessed his development as an author through the course of his books. Anyway, I'm not very far in so that's all I have to say about this one so far.

   But in general I think O'Hanlon might be unseating Paul Theoroux in my opinion as the best travel writer, though I just wish he had written more books! It's only these three and one more on a trawler in the North Atlantic.
End Book Review Interlude



   I expected we would just fly more or less straight west across north Africa but we instead took quite the detour north over the Mediterranean. I kind of expected maybe we'd avoid flying over Sudan but looking at the specific route we took I can only guess we were also trying to avoid flying over Libya and Mali as well. And you'd think this would have been planned in advance but then we arrived over an hour late so who knows. As it happens, sometimes like on the Mel-DXB leg, I don't look at the in flight maps but as I was just reading I had he map open the whole time so I'd look up at it every so often and be like "okay we're crossing over Alexandria now huh." "well look there's Malta now. Are we headed to Europe??"
   And also, don't forget, this whole time in the back of my mind I'm a little stressed about what will happen when we get to Guinea in terms of being able to get in without the yellow fever certificate.

   So by and by finally we landed. 3pm local (2am Saturday Melbourne, having left my house at 2pm Thursday). Last year they were checking temperatures and covid vaccination certificates just at the end of the boarding bridge but not so this time (also masks are being worn now by a handful of people but no longer either required or worn by a siginificant number of people). Rather than wait for my friends, I hurried along thinking it might take me awhile to deal with passport control. Proceeded directly to the woman in the "arrival visas" kiosk, who last year had been sullen and difficult and had extracted a bribe from me (by cleverly telling me I needed to pay, rather than actually asking for a bribe, I only realized later I'd already paid for the visa). But this time she waved me away saying "no marshe pas!" which to my very basic understanding of French seemed to be "don't walk" and made no sense -- though now I look it up and apparently it means "do not work" (though I wasn't wrong, marche does walk on its own). So I just went to the passport stamping kiosk and handed the woman there my passport and the paper showing my visa approval. Rather to my surprise she simply stamped the paper and the passport and waved me through.
   Last year not only had the first lady asked me a bunch of questions and made a big deal about issuing a visa, but then the person at hte passport stamping kiosk had ALSO grilled me on things like the address and phone number of where I was staying and my hosts and generally also made himself difficult. But this time and after all that stress I blew through passport control in probably a matter of seconds. Needless to say she didn't ask about a yellow fever certificate.
   And then I ended up waiting around for my friends, they were among the last off the airplane. As we exited the terminal they were met by their joyous families. My ride was a spot late due to traffic but by and by they came and collected me, took me to the hotel. Another difference I noted from last year was a very heavy policy presence last year. There were armed soldiers loitering menacingly in the airport last year, one had to squeeze past them on the narrow walkway out which was kind of intimidating, and then in the drive across town one would see them very visibily present in many places -- as I noted last year I even saw things like a heavily armed policeman (/ military? well I think they're "gendarmes" which are literally both police and military) savagely thwack a motorcyclist for not coming to a stop fast enough. The police presence was overwhelming and imminently menacing. I don't know if the political situation has in general improved here -- they still have the unelected military leader who took over in a coup -- but just from the first day's observations the military/police presence doesn't seem as overwhelming and menacing.



   Otherwise, at the same hotel again. Just chillin here (well it's 36c/98f out so maybe not exactly "chillin") Saturday (today) and then tomorrow I depart for up-country.

aggienaut: (Default)

   So today I went into Melbourne town to go to the German consulate and apply for a German passport, which seems to have been successful, then I met up with my Ecuadorian friend Michelle in an eastern suburb (Michem?); and then I found that the theatre that was showing the new All Quiet on the Western Front was at that point on my way home! So I decided to go see it.

   Got off the train in this suburb called Hawthorne that questionmark was just beside a university? Anyway leaving the train station one proceeds immediately into a cute laneway full of little shops and then the street outside was also full of cute little shops. The cinema seemed to be possibly an independant one, specializing in indie films and stuff. It appeared to have a full bar and coffee-bar in the waiting area.


   Anyway, on to the movie. I had seen the next-most-recent All Quiet on the Western Front (which I guess must have been the 1979 version?) as well as read the book in I think my junior year of high school so like 23 years ago. So the memories I'm comparing to this one to are a bit faded.
   This version had some great cinematography. And they did some clever things such as, it starts with fighting in the trenches, we see a soldier afraid to go up over to make the attack but finally he does and we see all the typical craziness of no man's land, and then we see the dead being collected, and their uniforms and boots being stripped off of them, then we see cartloads of bloody uniforms being cleaned, and repaired, and then we go to the actual protagonist of the film, Paul as a just-graduated schoolboy signing up to join the army with his friends, he receives a uniform, it has the name of the soldier we saw at the beginning on it still.
   What I didn't like about this version compared to what I remember of the last one is they tried to give it more of a plot, which I think actually took away from the point of the film. In the 1979 version, like in the book, the "plot" is mainly just that war is hell and we see the protagonist experience the war until he (spoiler alert) dies. And the story as written does a great job of carrying this to its conclusion. In this version they introduced a parallel storyline of the guy trying to negotiate the armistice, and by cutting between that and the protagonist they kind of make it seem like a race against time -- which, I can see why they thought that might be a good idea but I think it just cheapens the story as originally written. It takes attention off Paul's perspective and kind of eliminates what would be a more "this is never going to end" feel you'd have without it. Another similar decision they made is they also cut to the general or field marshall commanding Paul's area frequently, and he's eating a lavish meal with elegant settings nearly every time he's seen -- he's pointedly not once portrayed being out among the troops or doing anything militarily useful, but he does frequently speechify about how he doesn't want piece because he wants to win glory like his forefathers. I think this also really cheapened the film, in waht is otherwise a very serious film this character comes off like a comic book villian. His comments about how the peacemakers are betraying them did foreshadow the rise of nazism which was nice but the whole thing was too heavy handed. Also when he orders his troops to attack in the literal last fifteen minutes of the war, I couldn't help but be aware that while I've seen no record of the Germans doing so, the AMERICANS were noted to have done that -- having arrived late to the war there _were_ reportly American commanders who were so overeager to win some glory that they pushed futile assaults up until the minute of the armistice (see also, in the book / prev movie, Paul dies a month before the armistice, this one in their wholly unnecessary attempt to increase the tension has Paul die at the minute of the armistice).
   So altogether I enjoyed it though I think it would have been better if they had just had faith that the story as originally written didn't need to be hollywooded up. Ii give it a B+ If you're a connoisseur of war movies definitely give it a watch when it comes out on netflix later this month.

aggienaut: (Default)
August 13th - about 61 hours after i left my hotel in Conakry i was finally on my couch back home in Australia. Granted about 19 of those hours were in relative comfort in Accra, but the last 36 I essentially didn't sleep. Came home and napped for two hours but been trying to stay up till bed time to get back on a normal schedule.

El bossman had picked me up from the shuttle bus stop, it was good to see him. Then i stopped by the Carls Junior that had opened around the corner from work _the day i left_ for a good ole taste of home (+ The shake shack in Dubai Airport that makes two American burger chains in about 16 hours!) and then drove home!

Anyway i watched a lot of movies during my flights so it's time for airplane movie reviews!

The Northman - the main reason i wanted to see this was because as soon as i heard in the trailer that the protagonist was named Amleth i suspected it might be a retelling of the Amloda Saga, on which Hamlet is based. And it essentially was I suppose, though it diverged from the original saga in some ways but what can one expect. Ultimately it's your classic revenge story but chalk full of viking symbology. What i really liked is the intimations that the protagonist might not the good guy at all -- spoiler here: but he's sworn to avenge his father who is murdered by his uncle and marries his mother -- but then towards the end when he reveals to his mother that he's come to rescue her she reveals she'd been taken by his father as an involuntary war bride and had wanted the uncle to usurp his position. So one can see if that had been one's perspective all along, the uncle would be the good guy and Amleth the unsympathetic vengeful antagonist, but i felt they didn't explore this nearly as much as they could of, going more down a "Welp i guess mom is evil too!" track. Ultimately i give it a B+ because while i love all the reference to Norse mythology and a movie based on a saga, it ultimately fails to be more deep than a revenge story.

The Green Knight - (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Green_Knight_(film) ) is of course the classic tale of Gawain and the Green Knight. It was mostly true to the original plot and themes, with some divergences that are a spot baffling to me. The biggest thing to affect the story for me was the decision to go real heavy on the magical realism and is common with movies about Arthurian legends to set it in a place unrecognizable as historic England. Obviously the Arthurian legends always involve some magic that's incompatible with reality as we understand it and some fictional places, but i think it always hits better when set in the historical period it's supposed to be in. When it's set in a clearly dream like fantasy land its hard to get up any willing suspension of disbelief at all and it falls flat as a bunch of silly nonsense. Ultimately I give it a B-, high marks for good development of theme and the telling of a classic, counterbalanced with minus marks for choosing an absolute fantasy setting.

Voyagers (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyagers_(film)) - a group of 30 children + one adult are launched on an 86 year mission to another planet, where their grandchildren will arrive. Trouble begins when some of the children, teenagers by this point, realize they've been being dosed with a medication to dull their emotions and desires, and stop taking it. Then the adult supervisor is killed in mysterious circumstances, and things quickly devolve into a sort of Lord of the Flies in space. I think it was really well done, the themes are well developed, the behavior is plausibly portrayed. I give it an A

That was it for Accra to Dubai (i didn't even sleep), then Dubai to Melbourne i watched the following movies:

Mr Jones - i almost missed this one since the name wasn't very inspiring and the cover image wasn't particularly revealing either. But it had the backwards R of faux Cyrillics which inspired me to click on the description. It's the true story of a British journalist who traveled to Russia in the thirties and reported on the famine in Ukraine, which other at-the-time-acclaimed journalists were happily sweeping under the rug for Stalin. Of course i want to watch this movie! Well made and acted and a subject matter i am very interested in. Reminded me of "The Courier" which I'd watched on the inbound trip (https://emo-snal.livejournal.com/tag/movie%20reviews), if the name hadn't been so cryptic I'd have certainly have watched them back to back. I give it an A- just because I'm not sure someone who isn't into the subject matter as much of me would find it as gripping.

Okay enough with thinking movies, after 50 hours of travel it's time for some shoot em ups:

The Contractor - this follows the classic cliche plot line, good guy in tough situations reluctantly agrees to help with a caper, in this case in the flavor of at least thinking he's still fighting for good guys as a contractor. You guessed it, and this isn't even a spoiler because i think it's in the trailer -- turns out they're not good guys, it's just a heist. One thing that was very very unclear to me is i don't feel they developed at all why the protagonist suddenly realizes his boss is a bad guy. It's like one minute they are escaping from the semi botched heist and then for absolutely no reason as far as i can tell, the protagonist becomes convinced their boss is now trying to have them killed. Which he is but why? The rest of the movie seems to have been plausibly how things might play out for a down and out veteran but that the man that hired them is trying to kill them for literally no reason shit is just lame movie villain shit. And then he gets the evidence that the man they killed had developed a vaccine rather than the bio weapon he'd been told, and rather than make any effort whatsoever to get this vaccine now in his hands to people who could do something useful with it the movie plot utterly drops and forgets about this McGuffin vaccine and instead the protagonist just goes to shoot up his erstwhile boss, predictably successfully. I give it a C+ there were some good gunfight scenes and i think they did a good job with his moral turmoil over his life. There was a scene i liked where after he's mortally wounded one of his pursuers they sit and have a friendly chat, they're both veterans who didn't know what they were getting into.

Nobody - this one i wanted to see because from the trailers it looked kind of funny in a very intentionally unassuming kind of way, and it delivered on that. I think they did a good job of developing how boring and unsatisfying the protagonist's life is and then slowly working up to the reveal that his background isn't what it at first seemed. Beyond that it's not a terribly deep movie, it's the classic "guess i gotta kill these people so they'll leave me alone" type action movie but it had some real good fight scenes and i liked his restrained manner. The one thing that wasn't working for me is they had the guy who stayed Doc Brown in Back to the Future playing his father and spoiler alert he comes out the nursing home suddenly all alert and capable to participate in the final gun battle and i think all his scenes came off super cheasy and really cheapened things. I give it maybe a B- or C+, it's just a good shoot em ups movie nothing deeper than that.

Clean - a garbage man is trying to go through life and stay clean, from drugs and his own violent past. Trying to do good to those around him. Fairly typical stuff but where usually a movie like this would give maybe fifteen minutes to developing that in the beginning and then get on with shooting, I feel like 50-60% of the movie was that, and they did it well enough that it wasn't boring. And then surprise surprise he gets entangled with something and the "i have to kill these people so they'll leave me alone" plot is activated. Plus just like Nobody the bad guys initially think he's, well, nobody, and then quickly find out "he's basically the grim reaper." The one thing i particularly liked about it was i felt they did an unusually good job of humanizing the antagonist. He's definitely evil but you can understand his motivations and concerns. C+ because it's ultimately just another shoot em up.

And then even though i still had time to watch another movie, about four hours left of the flight, i thought i ought to try to get some kind of sleep. Though i was feeling very uncomfortable. I think i can only actually sleep on a flight if i have the bulkhead seat to lean against the bulkhead.
aggienaut: (Default)

   Picking up right where I left off, which was immediately prior to boarding my flight to Dubai: so of course I was in the last boarding group, Group F. I don't know how the boarding groups get chosen but I am somehow always always in the last one. Which meant there was no room for my backpack in the overhead bins so my feet had to cohabitate the already meagre foot space with my backpack for the 14 hour journey. Airplane was a double-decker airbus thing, which is apparently a thing these days. Had a middle seat, got excited when the guy with the window asked if he could trade seats, but apparently he only was interested in the seat on the aisle ("because I'm gonna be getting up to go to the bathroom a lot"). Which she declined and then I'm like oh great. But he ended up only needing to get up four (maybe five?) times which I suppose isn't terribly unreasonable on a 14 hour flight
   I don't generally make a habit of asking my seat neighbors what they're up to any more, but eventually I asked the slightly older caucasian woman to my left where she was headed, because she seemed friendly.
   "Lagos, Nigeria"
   "Lagos?? What are you doing in Lagos??" I asked, surprised
   "Oh a development project, you?"
   "Ghana... for a development project."
   Turns out she's working with this organization called Nigerian Montane Forest Project. And they'd been in fact thinking of doing a project to promote beekeeping! So I gave her my card and I'm sure we'll talk more about this -- good thing I didn't never talk to her!
   The other guy, the one with the window seat, was on his way to see family in the Czech Republic, whom he hasn't seen in four years.

   And now it's time for a return of our classic segment:
In Flight Movie Reviews
The Courier - The Courier is about a British businessman who was recruited to help smuggle Soviet secrets out of Moscow to, as the movie portrays anyway, prevent the Cuban Missile Crisis from resulting in nuclear annihilation. I really liked it, it was well acted, well done, a true spy story (it assures us). I give it an A

Rogue - Next even though even from the brief summary it didn't sound very good (something like "A mercenary leads a unit of soldiers in a mission in Africa of rescuing a government official's daughter, who has been held hostage. Starring Megan Fox") I watched this movie just to see how Hollywood is portraying Africa these days. It was so bad I only kept watching just to see how the trainwreck would go. Aside from a generally dumb plot and the "elite soldiers" utilizing tactics even I could see were idiotic, and it goes from guns-blazing shoot em up to everyone-gets-picked-off-one-by-one-at-night-by-a-badky-CGIed-lion horror flick halfway through but my main impression is that I found it wildly racist. Not in that it actively portrays black people as inferior but in that it's set in Africa and yet the only actual Africans in the movie are the bad guy soldiers who die by the joblot -- and one member of the good guys who is just an emotional basketcase who is easily emotionally bullied by anyone and everyone including a teenage girl. And the leaders of the bad guys are all Middle Eastern despite that this does not appear to be taking place in north Africa. Because the one good guy African mentions he's maasai, and the baddies are referred to as Al-shabaab, I assumed it takes place in Kenya or Tanzania, but, the text at the end about lion farming in South Africa implies its supposed to be set there. Most likely all of Africa is a much of a sameness to the producers of this terrible movie. Also while Al-shabaab is Muslim, they would look like East Africans and I think the directors of this movie just thought all Muslims must look middle eastern. Also their mission is to rescue this white girl because she's "the governor's daughter" ... but neither Kenya nor any other African country has any white governors so I think the filmmakers assumption that the local governor must be white is also a fundamentally racist misunderstanding of Africa. F and everyone involved should be "cancelled"

I'm Your Man - now this is, I believe, a romance, which is not the type of movie I usually watch / review but the woman sitting beside me was watching it, and conveniently had closed captions on so I ended up watching it too and despite being a romance I found myself being kind of into it. I think because it was very existential / philosophical -- the plot involves a woman (who is incidentally an archeologist) apparently agreeing to help test out a robot who has been designed to be her perfect partner, so as you can imagine it involves lots of philosophical/existential "yes but you're not real" "you're only saying that because your algorithm says to" stuff. So like, I dunno, as far as romances go I give it an A.

Hive - "A woman who's husband has been missing for seven years since the war in Kosovo turns to beekeeping despite local resistance to a woman working." Or something like that (is what the blurb would have said). Or as the google blurb says "Hoping to provide for their families, struggling widows start a business to sell a local food product. Together, they find healing and solace in the new venture, but their will to live independently is soon met with hostility." I actually really liked it BUT there's a weird bit of false advertising going on here. The movie heavily implies that "local food product" is honey. I mean it's called Hive and there's a picture of her in a beekeeping suit as the cover image. Well there's about a minute of beekeeping in the movie, it really barely has anything to do with the movie. She's seen having a go at it twice, both times she seems to be struggling and gets stung, and the local food product she ends up producing and marketing appears to be some kind of Balkan salsa -- it's definitely not the honey she barely sells. Despite not being about beekeeping I found it to be a compelling story about the community dealing with the loss of so many of their husbands and menfolk in the war, not knowing if they're alive or dead, and women trying to support themselves in a community that frowns on it. If I give another movie an A am I perhaps being too lenient in this batch of reviews??


      Having departed Melbourne at 9:15pm, arrived (14?) hours later in Dubai at 5am, whereupon it was already 35 degrees celsius there. Layover in Dubai was uneventful, except in checking my email I finally had an email with a pdf of confirmation of my Ghana visa-on-arrival which is pretty last minute as far as those things go. Flight from Dubai to Ghana (nine hours?) 7:40am to 11:35am. I rather fancied I wouldn't even bother to redeem my visa-on-arrival since I already had a visa, but as I came down the escalator into the passport control hall a young man hailed me "Are you Kris Fricke?" and it turned out he'd been arranged to sort me out with the visa on arrival. I tried to explain that I probably didn't need it but he was undeterred so I just decided to go with it and he walked me to the visas on arrival counter and facilitated talking it through with them. He was apparently an airport employee not presently on shift who had been arranged by our contacts on the ground here to help me through a friend of a friend of his or something. This is how things work in Africa. On the plus side then I got to walk right past the big passport control cues with him and he stayed with me until we met the hotel's driver out front. I had cynically expected the hotel driver to fail to show up but there he was with a sign with my name on it. So altogether my arrival in Ghana was unusually smooth. Never before have the people I'm workign with managed to have someone meet me inside the secured part of the airport so I'm usually on my own until I get out of the baggage claim.

   Hotel was a short distance from the airport. Initial impressions of Ghana are that it's not nearly as undeveloped as Guinea (which literally has raw sewage in gutters just outside the airport and shanties), but doesn't give me that trying-really-hard-to-be-cool vibe I get from Nigeria. Nigeria is like trying to jump from undeveloped to the French riviera. Not that I've been to the French riviera. Or Nigeria in over ten years now so maybe I'm out of date who knows!

   And hotel as usual is ridiculously fancy compared to what I'm accustomed to. Due to it being relatively cheap to employ people they're gratuituously overstaffed. I come down here by the pool (which has really over the top faux rock formation decorations all around it and several fountains) to sit and be on my laptop (Because my room as nice as it is only has a small window so it feels a bit confining to hang out in) and even though there's no one else here there's three bar staff on duty who jump up to assist me. And then I poke my head in the hotel restaurant just to see what it looks like and even though there's no guests currently in there, there's three staff who jump up to assist me.

   And that's the latest. Just relaxing the rest of the afternoon, recoverign from the long journey, and tomorrow I travel onward to the inland Ghanaian town of Tamale.

aggienaut: (Default)

   Time for some more (short) movie reviews

No Time to Die
   I recently noticed the most recent Bond movie was available to rent via Youtube, which is apparently a thing these days. I had wanted to see it, so on a recent evening I watched it. What I'm about to say is jsut slightly a spoiler so skip the next sentence if you're really concerned .. but in the beginning when they were kind of making it seem like a Spectre plot I was preparing to be disappointed because I've always found that particular world-conspiracy plot of Bond stupid and comic-booky, but then when they just kill off all of Spectre all of a sudden all at once that was proportionatly that much of a pleasant surprise. In a more general sense though, haven't all the Bond movies for the last 20 years made a big thing about him being culturally out-dated and feeling redundant? I felt like that part of the plot was a bit, no pun intended, but getting old. What really made me groan about the movie plot though was how more than once he makes major life changing decisions based on taking as absolute truth something a dying bad guy said. I would kind of like to believe our supposed world's best subterfuge agent would at least consider that the dying bad guy might be lying to fuck with and misdirect him, I dunno, just a thought.
   Also his love interest clearly lives in Norway, why does she appear to primarily speak French? Did the producers think Norway the more beautiful exotic location but French the sexier language and so just decided to have their cake and og spis det også?
   And that ending.. I guess I can't really talk about it since I try to write these spoiler free, but.. such sauce! Anyway I give it an A-


Dune
   I think I also watched Dune via noticing it was available on the youtube movies. I read the Dune books back in like elementary school, which is of course longer ago than the Butlerian Jihad is from the Dune timeline and I barely remember any details. Well okay actually recently I read one of the books by Frank Herbert's son (The Butlerian Jihad) and it was terrible just terrible.
   But the movie was visually very nice and from what I can recall true to the books ... in fact I googled for differences from the books and they're apparently only very minor. I weirdly don't feel like I have a lot of critiquing for the movie. Feel free to critique it in the comments, I'm suspicious I may have just watched it in a very uncritical mood or something, it's not like me to be so uncritical ;) But anyway I suppose I have to give it an A then. (:

aggienaut: (Default)

Greyhound
   I had really wanted to see Greyhound when it came out in theatres but then.. it didn't, due to being released at the height of the pandemic. I made a concerted effort to try to watch this movie a few weeks ago but I could not find any legal way for me to watch it (it appeared to be available via some television channel but I don't have a TV and am not about to subscribe to a whole tv channel service to watch one god damn movie). Then I tried torrenting it but was unsuccessful in even this. It's hard to be a pirate any more. Then I asked my friends, among whom are several leet haxxor IT professionals -- my birthday was coming up the following Saturday so I dropped that somehow acquiring this movie for me would be a nice present that should be easy and free for them to accomplish. Yeah no no one came through and I spent my 40th birthday eating pancakes by myself.
   So instead Ii watched Dunkirk since it was on Netflix.


Dunkirk
   At first I thought something was wrong with my sound system and actually fiddled with the nobs and the settings before realizing the movie actually begins with a few minutes of complete silence as some soldiers walk through (the town of Dunkirk?). Not even footfalls or other small noises. I guess they thought they were being artsy but I thought it was stupid and distractingly frustating. It would have been more poignant I think if it was _mostly_ silent but with some small noises like their footsteps and maybe occasional and increasing distant gunfire.
   The movie plot is simple, this one protagonist soldier (do we even get his name? I forget) is trying to escape Dunkirk even if it means cutting queues, stowing away, impersonating others, etc. He has no backstory. No character has any backstory. No character has any character development. Everyone just does what they do. It also follows a fighter pilot and the civilian crew of a rescue boat. These different story lines are ostensibly ongoing simulteniously but disconcertingly it will be the middle of the night for one set of characters then we flash to another set who are experiencing daylight and back to the people who are experiencing nighttime, all within what 50 miles of eachother?
   Altogether, it was a bit fun in as much as I always like WWII style settings but being that it was actually a pretty insipid movie imo. I give it a C+


Topgun II
   Opening scrawl: "The Navy has established a training school for its elite 1% ... they call it ... Topgun: Maverick" and here's me thinking to myself uh what, yeah maybe they call it Topgun but I don't tihnk they call it Topgun Maverick. Okay mate we're 10 seconds into the movie and you're killing me with this grammar/syntax crash.
   Saw the movie in the theatre with my friend Trent (who had already seen two other movies in the theatre earlier that day???). The movie was in a lot of places very predictable, harping on obvious themes (we get it he's getting older, has friction with superiors because he's a "maverick," and his former colleagues are all admirals now), and obvious homages to the original. A lot of scenes that made most of the audience laugh out loud had me rolling my eyes, maybe I'm too cynical.
   Weird decision I'm puzzling over, so they homaged the infamous "homoerotic volleyball scene" from the original with a homoerotic beach football scene, but their one female fighter pilot is barely glimpsed in the background and was wearing a very conservative bathing suit. Were they trying to go out of their way not to sexualize her? If so its kind of weird to do so as they're overtly sexualizing the entire male cast in that scene.
   Also I thought it was funny how adamantly ambiguous the movie remained about the baddies to be faced at the end. They're a "rogue state" but no location is ever given, there's no flags or other identifying features. And even their fighters are not MiGs but "fifth generation fighters." One helicopter seen is clearly a Soviet designed Mi-24 but then again they also have US designed F-14s so its hard to say they're anything other than Baddyland. The snow and pine forests seem to rule out the middle east, and its obviously somewhere adjoining carrier accessible sea. The remaining options then are coast of China, North Korea (actually this is quite plausible), Russian coast, or somewhere in Scandinavia/Baltics. This obviously is sort of an exercise in futility since they clearly want it to be an entirely fictional place, which I think is kinda a cop out (what afraid of hurting film sales in North Korea?).
   Ultimately the movie does deliver on its trademark chair gripping action scenes, and I enjoyed that there was kind of a twist to the final mission rather than it simply being a success. Then I walked out of the movie theatre feeling like shit I'm 40 and I'm not even a washed up fighter pilot what am I doing with my life. Altogether I give it a B

aggienaut: (Default)

   Moar movie reviews! Rather inadvertently I've collected an international selection here, An Australian, Georgian, Macedonian and Namibian movie, with further references to a Norwegian and Bosnian movie. (:

Danger Close (2019): This is another one I got put onto by something I saw on the youtube. This is an Australian film about an Australian unit in Vietnam. I'd seen the classic Americna Vietnam films such as Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, Apocalypse Now, etc, so it was interesting to compare the Australian perspective to those, thought frankly its been so long since I'd seen any of the aforementioned my memory of any of them is vague and general. Here's a crazy thought that occurred to me, when I was a teenager in the 90s WWII was as long ago as the Vietnam War is now.
   Anyway, I found this movie to be well made and engaging with numerous well fleshed out characters. They seemed to focus on fleshing out their character flaws thoug or that was their primary idea of how to flesh characters out, as every character seemed to have major character flaws ... which is much better than everyone being golden at least. Also the director must have had a major anti-establishment bend as with every step higher in rank the chraacter is portrayed more unlikably, with several comparatively unknown characters prominently disobeyed orders from the known battalion staff (ie helicopter pilots fly in after being ordered not to, mechanized infantry drive their APCs in after being ordered not to, also the commander of the main-character-platoon refuses to withdraw when ordered to), with the colonel ordering these things portrayed as not making the right decisions and the general above him portrayed as all but incompetent. I bring this up because it compares to the Soviet propaganda themes I mentioned in last entry, where in Soviet films the protagonists always followed orders very well. American films like to have the protagonist heroically defy a stupid order but its not usually occurring over and over again like this film (and its usually done by main characters, in this case its relatively unknown characters who just pop up to disobey orders, so the focus isn't on a hero disobeying orders but rather on how many people are disobeying the commanding offers who are prominent characters in the film), I wonder if its because Australia is even more anti-authority than America? And also, because all the characters are based on real people, using their names and casting actors who look like them, I really wonder if the portrayal was quite fair to all real people involved.
   Also the commander of the platoon is that guy who plays Ragnar in Vikings and he mostly spends a lot of time making the same crafty/brooding looks.
   Altogether A-

   I'd be curious if there was a good movie from the point of view of some North Vietnamese soldiers or just Vietnamese who aren't solidly on the allied side, if anyone knows of any good ones?


Tangerines (2013): If one is searching for this movie it's important to include the year because "Tangerine (2015)" is apparently a movie about prostitutes and pimps or something as I found out ahaha. Thanks [livejournal.com profile] mexpatriot for putting me on to this film in comments to last entry. Unfortunately I had the hardest time with subtitles. The version I downloaded once again didn't hve them, so I downloaded seperate subtitles but they were out of sync. So I downloaded tow more subtitles files that were both our of sync in the same way. After googling and asking around I determined that I should download another shareware media player, VLC, which makes it easy to sync subtitles. This worked except for some reason every time I synced the subtitles and film it would quickly get out of sync again until about every ten minutes it would be so far off I'd have to resync it, which wouldn't have been tedious doing it just once but became tedious hving to do it that frequently (it usually involved watching a part multiple times to press the right keys at the right time to bring the right dialogue in sync with itself). I guess the subtitle files were all running at a slower rate for some reason? Bizarre. Hope I never have to deal with that again for a future movie, it made watching really a bit tedious.

   Anyway, the film takes place in the Georgian breakaway province of Abhkazia, which is an area I've always been interested in. It's the classic "two guys from opposing sides are stuck with eachother" subgenre, in this case a Chechen and a Georgian both badly injure eachother and are nursed back to health in the same house by an Estonian living there. Even having formally studied the conflict in university it was a bit hard to sort out who was on what side. In reality Abkhazia had broken off Georgia and Russia had sent "peacekeepers" in to help "protect" Abkhazia, but I was wondering what these Chechens were doing there since Chechens had been at war with Russia just prior to that so it wasn't my first guess that they'd be on the same side as the Russian backed Abkhazians, but apparently these characters were mercenaries who were in fact on the Russian/Abkahzian side. Anyway, you probably don't care about that ahaha suffice to say it was a spot confusing, but maybe that's the point.
   The protagonist Estonian appears to have some beehives but they are never mentioned and there appeared to be no activity on front of them despite being seen in good weather so I think they were just empty props.
   It reminded me of two other films along the same idea: No Man's Land (2001) is a Bosnian film in which a Serb and an Albanian get trapped together between the front lines, and even a visit from blue-helmeted UN Peacekeepers ("oh here come the smurfs) can't break their stalemate. It was a bit dark comedy almost, I really liked it (I gave it an A-). And Into the White (2012) is a Norwegian film in which s luftwaffe and a British aircraft shoot eachother down in a remote part of Norway and then have to survive together. "Based on a true story" and featuring gorgous Norwegian scenery, I can't quite recall the finer points to put it in a rank with these other two films.
   My watching experience was certainly detracted by the subtitles problems but I think I give Tangerines a B+.


Honeyland (2019): Finally got around to watching this movie I'd been wanting to see (yes having figured out how to torrent I've been knocking out all the movies I've been meaning to watch). Ehh it was fun to see a movie about beekeeping and was well done, and I appreciated the themes, but I dunno, maybe I'm an uncultured ogre for not loving something so critically acclaimed but maybe I just prefer a bit more action in a movie, because I only feel like giving it a B-


Baxu and the Giants (2019): Okay here's proof that I don't only like war movies! You need to watch this cute little Namibian movie. I say little because it's only 29 minutes long. The protagonist is a nine year old girl, the general plot involves a neighbor poaching rhinos, and the cinematography is amazing. AND it's available on netflix so you don't even need to engage in piracy for this one. A+


   The current state of streaming movies is a bit odd. Now that there's several competing streaming empires to Netflix, and movies always seem to be exclusively on one or the other, what do they expect us to do? Do they really expect us to either subscribe to every single streaming empire, or to content ourselves with only their own selection? If I could legally support the makers of indie movies I would, but they're kind of forcing people into a life of piracy if they want to see a variety of movies that belong to the vassallage of different media empires.



   Unrelated photo from nearby Lake Colac the other day.


And an unrelated political thought of the day: Honestly if say ten years ago you proposed making a movie with an evil small handed orange skinned super villain trying to spread disease assisted by a goblinoid sycophant henchman who sweats a thick black fluid and is constantly audibly farting I'd have said that's a pretty silly fantasy setting

aggienaut: (Default)

   So Pandora finally figured out how to block my VPN a bit ago, and spotify quickly showed itself to be so awful at predicting music I might like that about 90% of its choices were awful, and then Ii discovered that youtube does a pretty good auto-mix predicting music I might like. Well that was good for awhile and I actually discovered a fair number of songs I liked, but what it's not good at is anticipating when I've heard a song I like _too_ much and now I'm starting to become a bit frustrated with youtube always serving me up the exact same selection.

   But the other consequence of this is that I've been logging into youtube on the daily, primarily for the music, but its always optimistically suggesting other things. So I rediscovered my love of Stephen Colbert, and then tentatively branched out to other stand up hosts: I found Jimmy Kimmel bareable, Jimmy Fallon can get a chuckle if one is really bored but somehow his demeanor comes off like he's skulking in a corner like a chastised dog, and this guy Seth Myers, is it just me or is he like 0% funny? He's like a guy reading the news in a desperate trying-too-hard tone with the occasional dead-on-arrival joke punctuated by a "that was funny wasn't it??" expression. It's painful to watch.

   Anyway what I came here to write about was that so I got served up this compilation of scenes from a movie:



   And I felt quite compelled to watch the movie. It turns out it's not easy being a pirate any more. It took me quite I bit of fiddling with torrents and wading into dodgy website before I finally managed to get the movie, T-34, and even then it didn't have subtitles but surprisingly downloading and integrating subtitles only took 5 min or less.
   I didn't really have high hopes, but late Saturday night I was finally in the mood to lean back, pour myself a glass of mead, and watch a mindless shoot em up movie. I was actually pleasantly surprised. Don't get me wrong, it's not exactly deep and meaningful with subtle analogies future generations will analyze or inspiring character development arcs, but as a shoot em up movie it delivers. It's heavy on the sort of CGI you see in the above video but I thought that was well done as far as CGI goes. And wheras most shoot em ups are people running around with guns or random explosions, it was kind of fun to see a shoot em up that was specifically tanks doing their tank thing. There was even a surprising twist about a third of the way through which caught me totally by surprise because I wasn't expecting any twists.
   Its also hilariously propagandistic. It's clearly made by and for a Russian audience and the "rah rah rah Russia is the best!" component is a bit eyeroll and giggle worthy. The movie would have you believe the Germans were absolutely shaking in their boots at the utter prowess of all Russian tankers. For a context not given in the movie: the Russian T-34 was, I believe, an inferior tank to the German tanks it was facing though it was pretty good for its "price point" and Russia was able to churn out a bazillion of them, stuff them with scarcely trained farm boys and "Zerg rush" the Germans with them. So to have one T-34 destroying joblots of panthers is... very optimistic ;)
   I took a Russian Film class back in college and one thing I had enjoyed actually was the way propagandistic themes were woven into the films, so for me personally it had the added layer of comparing the specific thrusts of its propaganda with old classics of the Soviet era such as Chapaev and The Cranes are Flying.
   But all that being said, the jingoism wasn't sickeningly saccharin just kinda laughable, and we can all get behind nazis getting what they deserve anyway, so I enjoyed the movie and felt in a silly good mood by the end. So can recommend as far as shoot em up war movies go. A-


   As long as I'm on about Russian movies, my favorite soviet classic is The Reds and the Whites (the director actually got in real hot water for portraying the Whites (anticommunists) too humanely and the war not as a heroic affair but as awful and brutal); and favorite more recent film is Prisoner of the Mountains which takes place during the (first) Chechen war in 1996.

aggienaut: (Star Destroyer)

I have seen the new Star Wars, The Rise of Skywalker. Unspoilerific notes are that it felt a bit obsessively fast paced, I swear they were in an entirely different scene every 7 seconds throughout the whole thing and visited like 17 different planets. Sloww dowwwwwn. And several characters were briefly introduced and/or other random thnigs happened that seemed to have no explanation other than being a gratuitous hook into some spinoff story they already have planned or maybe something they plan to put in a ride in Disneyland.

Potential Spoilers! )

aggienaut: (Numbat)

   So last night I finally saw the Han Solo movie, on netflix. Altogether I found it really disappointing. The following review will contain lots of spoilers.

Spoiler alert! )




Bonus: Rogue 1!
   In looking the other things in my Star Wars tag I was shocked just now to realize apparently I never wrote a review of Rogue One?? From this distant vantage point it's hard for me to remember much of value of specifics so much as to say I recall I really liked it, I think to me it captured the feel of the original trilogy the best of all the movies that have come out since. It was just kind of bittersweet watching it knowing that all the characters had to die to explain why they don't show up in any subsequent movie. Though I think knowing they were going to die the writers didn't write them with the kind of wankery assumption that we'll love them as new upcoming trilogy stars as they did with all those irritating characters around Rey in the new movies. I really liked the Rogue One sarcastic robot in particular. (sarcastic robot in Han Solo seemed kind of a sad immitation of him, and why does a robot have to so clearly correspond to a human ethnic cliche??)

aggienaut: (Star Destroyer)
Non Spoilery Bit

   So I saw Star Wars Episode VIII yesterday. It's number eight right? I feel like it's becoming very confusing trying to accurately refer to the movies. In discussion after the movie with my friends we kept saying "but now the last one, well not the last one, the prequel to this, but not the prequels, just the one that comes right before this.. in the time line!"
   And being as Disney probably intends to keep milking this franchise with a movie a year or so, and in the immediate future looks to be continuing to jump around the timeline (from what I hear the next one will kind of concurrant to Rogue One?), I think this is going to get VERY confusing!!
   At least there's no "alternative timelines" like in Star Trek!! (though a whole slew of books have been uncanonized by subsequent movies ... bring back Admiral Thrawn!!)

   But anyway, how shocking was it when they revealed Jar Jar Binks is Grand Master Snopes??? I mean uh, I better put up the spoiler break!


Spoilers Ahead! )




And Here's an Entirely Unrelated Picture of the Day

This picture is partly here so that if someone wants to comment on the non-spoiler part and not be spoilerized there's a bit of a buffer between the comment box and the spoilerized dicta.

But also I can't believe I apparently haven't yet posted this cute picture of these Kyrgyz kids and their donkeys?? This was up in the mountains, there was a nearby yurt in which they appeared to live.

aggienaut: (Spacecat)

   It's time for another episode of netflix show reviews!


Star Trek Discovery
   I had previously reported optimistically on the new Star Trek Disco after the first few episodes. Now it's on a "mid season break" (when did that become a thing??" so it's a good time to look back and how it has or has not lived up to expectations. I still find it interesting and watchable but I think it's fallen short of being The Next Big Thing.
   Character Development: In the first few episodes they were of course introducing characters left and right and trying to rapidly round them out. This was exciting at the time, but it appears to me that they've done the lazy thing of having a character appear one way in the first episode they'er introduced, "show them changing" in like one episode, and from the third time they show onward oh look they're such a changed person! I put also into this category the terribly written romance that I feel isn't even a spoiler because from the moment the two characters are first in the same room together it's obvious we're looking at a terribly written romance on our hands. This "romance" takes about an episode to result in their inevitable getting together. I hate to read the speculations as it sometimes comes awfully close to feeling like a spoiler, but for my part I feel like it seems unlikely they plan to keep a cutesy relationship going for the rest of the series so I reckon the guy gets killed or betrays them all or something otherwise unfortunate interrupts this entirely contrived romance. Thus leaving our protagonist with a broken heart, oh how cute ... and subtly done as hammer.
   Continuity Problems: I think the consensus with the way the series fits in with the other shows in the franchise is that it either is in or sends itself to an alternative dimension. Star Trek is nerdy enough, and all these alternative timelines are hard enough to swallow for normal Trekkies, it seems like that explanation would be really off-putting to non-Trekkies trying to watch. "So how does this fit in with Captain Kirk and all that? Alternative dimensions whaa? ::eyes glaze over, clicks over to Top Chef::" And that explanation still doesn't explain why technology is somehow across the board better than in the Original Series, or the uniforms wildly different. The Original Series uniforms look tacky sure but they could have made them at least vaguely reminiscent. One particular technology that has been bothering me is I feel like in the other serieses they would get messages that clearly had reached them from somewhere else at much-faster-than-light-speed, but it still seemed like it wasn't easy, they wouldn't just casually call someone up for high definition real time hologram conversation. Even if this is a divergent timeline, technology would have generally proceeded at the same general rate wouldn't it?
   General Context of Things: this may sound a bit more quibbling, but because their new technology allows them to pop up anywhere instantaneously, and with the added instant communication to anywhere. The feeling that they are anywhere specific has been lost. When they're in a situaion I don't feel they are alone far far away trying to deal with it, like you feel in OS or TNG, but rather they are a button press from home. There's no sense of contextual location. And I find that bothers me.

   What I do like though is when characters from the original series wander into the story. I suppose that's why they set it at this time. Though even this they mess up frequently, like I think it hasn't been adequately explained how she's apparently Spock's adopted sister and yet has somehow never come up before.

   So anyway, as you may have gathered, I'm not wholly impressed with the show so far, though I'm sure I'll keep watching once they get back from their break to see where they go with it. Now as it happens, when they left me in the lurch for this random break, my attention has been caught by something else, a show I have come to love!





The Expanse
   I hadn't really heard any mention of this from my friends or usual sources of hub-bub about shows you really ought to watch, so it was kind of blind luck I guess that it caught my attention on netflix. I started watching it, quickly found myself binging straight through with an episode a night until I got through all of the two current seasons.
   THe show takes place (200?) years in the future, where people have thoroughly colonized mars and some other locations, but by and large haven't learned to break any currently known laws of physics and as such are confined to the solar system. Interestingly I had been wishfully thinking such a series already existed and thinking about it months ago! In the series the Earth is governed by the UN, and an independant Mars is the major rival. There's many colonies in the asteroid belt that don't have independence themselves but really want it.
   Character Development: As you may have noticed, I am big on character development and complex characters. In this series many of the characters slowly and extremely believably develop throughout the series. There's even a romance that I actually _liked!_ -- it was NOT something you'd expect in the first many episodes with the two characters but slowly you started to see how it might happen and actually felt pleased when it finally did. Also complex characters -- many characters who aren't entirely good or entirely bad despite what your first impression might be.
   Compelling Storyline: man I can't wait until next season to find out where this is all going!! and I don't know who to root for!
   Literary Allusions: if I wasn't sold on it already, the moment the group of main-est main characters named their ship the Rocinante you know I was sold for sure!
   Plausible future: I also just really love how it's not the basically kind of fanciful future of Star Trek and/or many other sci fi universes but everything you see is an entirely plausible extrapolation of where we might be without breaking the rules of physics as they are currently understood, as well as plausible political and societal developments. In my own vague idea of a series set in the 100-200 year future I ALSO had always thought of the UN being the world government and big corporations being major political players. Oh that's another thing I liked, where a lot of shows go to great lengths to not call the world governing body the UN but rather something understood to be the same but different, or won't name any current corporations or organizations, in this one you see "fedex" written on shipping containers in space and there are mormons. Space mormons!

   Shortcomings: There's really just a few shortcomings I can think of that prevent the show from potentially being GoT-level good (I discount the most recent GoT season in my consideration of "GoT-level good" ;) ) -- (1) while characters who have been well developed and you thought were gonna have a larger role DO very occasionally die, by and large I feel pretty confident that the main characters aren't about to die, and I really think that uncertainly that someone will survive a given incident is part of the magic with GoT. (2) now, I am not craving gratuitous GoT level nudity in order to approve of a series, but when, for example, as a major plot development a character was discovered naked and dead, when they used contrived camera angles or object placements to preserve the body's modesty, it just makes it feel a bit stilted and prudish, and takes your mind out of the storyline itself back into thinking of it as a tv show. Storyline-pertinent nudity souldn't be contrivedly avoided! Don't be so American!

   But in conclusion, I gosh darn love this series and if you are remotely into sci fi you should watch it!!


   ...also is it just me or does that main character James Holden remind me a lot of Jon Snow? (Edit: haha while googling for an official Expanse picture to include here I came across this)


Random Picture of the Day


   A donkey in Kyrgyzstan. I don't think I've shared this one yet? It's actually my desktop background. At the time, having gotten a new computer just before this project I didn't have much to choose from and it was a picture I had just taken, but I quite like it. Though man I know I recently saw a picture I had taken of a rocket shaped monument out in rural Kyrgyzstan which would be perfect here, but considering all my pictures from more than a month ago have been lost I can't think of where I had seen it, maybe I'm just remembering having seen it before The Loss. ):

aggienaut: (Spacecat)

   Now, I don't really watch TV (I don't actually own a TV), and I rarely seem to be watching whatever everyone else is watching (though after GoT had been going four or five years I finally caught up whilst in a cave in central Turkey and have been a huge fan ever since), but I do sometimes watch things on Netflix.
   Back in high school when Star Trek Next Generation was still airing I was rather fond of it. I watched a bit of Deep Space Nine but it failed to really catch my interest and they seemed to be just godmoding around once they got their super stealth space fighter jet the Defiant going on (though admittedly I was already barely following things by then), and Voyager really I think I just didn't find any of the characters likable, and many of them downright annoying. And then that series Enterprise, I've never seen at all but from the trailers and things it just didn't appeal to me, though I don't remember well enough to say what put me off. And the movies! the more recent movies have all felt like they were trying to be a stupid action movie too hard instead of whatever it is exactly that makes Star Trek Star Trek, and having to compress their storylines into a movie -- people are zipping all over hte galaxy and having interstellar action sequences which make it feel like the whole galaxy is one very small place.

   But the Discovery trailers somehow caught my interest and enticed me to watch it, and now, lo, verily, I am caught up on a series in its first season, I can for once participate in the true heart and soul of livejournal, fandomry!

   I have found the series to be a really good mix of action and adventure without feeling forced like the recent movies. There's plenty of action happening but it's still very Star Trek.

   One major thing I really look for in series or movies is complex characters. Star Trek has had a tendency to have everyone in Starfleet be just such a nice chap / woman, unless they're a purpose written bad apple who will die in the episode. So far in Discovery there appear to be several crew members you're really not sure you like, and I watch subsequent episodes just HOPING they don't become likable, because I'm black hearted like that. Without giving any spoilers away, the (current?) captain of the Discovery in particular definitely seems like someone not entirely admirable, and I love that. He seems to have done some extremely questionable things in the past. I hope he does more!

   The one big problem seems to be that, from my just-now-googling, it appears to take place ten years before the original series, but general look and unfiforms specifically are definitely not the same as in the Original series, and the level of technology seems to be more advanced. In particular their key piece of experimental technology seems like it breaks "the universe" by being more advanced than anything subsequently seen.... but it also seems like it might be unethical so maybe it ends up getting buried....

   Also is it just me or is Klingon style in this century totally baroque?

   And was there a starfleet bridge officer in the first two episodes with a big blocky robot head? You only catch glimpses of them and I'm almost tempted to go back and rewatch because the question is bothering me.


And speaking of doodling, just because I believe every entry should have an image component, here's a piece of a little adventure I doodled up that I call "spacecat."



Meanwhile in real life
   Went over to the fire station for some more training for joining the volunteer fire brigade, but it was interrupted when they actually got a call out and had to scramble. "In the olden days we coulda taken you with us but these days you can't come along until you're certified"
   Walking back home across an empty paddock in the middle of "town" and looking up to see the millions of starts and the milky way I thought to myself "man, I love this town."

   In other news my fridge now appears to be broken. I think someone has put a hex on my electronic devices :'(

aggienaut: (Numbat)

   Hello from Paris, France.

   I will be attending the world beekeeping conference in Istanbul and due to the vagaries of airline
pricing I am taking a very convoluted route there and back. So now I'm in France.

   Departed Melbourne Sunday after I believe not quite even two weeks back. The equinox and therefore beginning of Spring (by my reckoning anyway -- Australians are barbaric heathens who just consider the season to change on the first of every third month), which, normally I don't travel much during Spring and Summer because the beekeeping season is on, but hey this conference is Kinda A Big Deal.


And now another episode of...
In Flight Movie Reviews!
   I've watched just about everything worth watching and Etihad has an unusually bad selection (and a huge amount of auto playing advertisements! I remarked on this last time but it bears commenting again, I thought you were supposed to be classy Etihad!) so this is really down to scraping the bottom of the barrel for crumbs.

X-Files Season 10 - I've had to turn to the "TV Shows" section of the in flight entertainment I've gotten that desperate. Anyway this is the new season of X Files after something like a ten year hiatus! Ah the memories of watching that intro (they didn't change it!) back in high school! Of the three episodes I thought the first one seemed a bit more there's-very-definitely-a-alien-related-government-conspiracy than I think I remember there being but then again I'm not sure how accurate my memory is. Episode 2 was good and a bit in a different direction, glad they're starting out running through the paces. And Episode 3 was really quite funny and I really liked it. Not to give away any spoilers but it was in the strange small town happenings / cryptids / monsters category.

Arthur: Legend of the Sword: I really didn't even want to watch this the trailers had looked ridiculous but eventually during the 14th hour of the flight or so I gave in because I do really like Arthurian stuff and thought I'd at least have a look at it, and.... it's utterly ridiculous!!! Like. WTF. It seems to take place in a not-England fantasy land except London is there. There are giant (giant!!) elephants with castles on their backs, the bad guys have an army of pleather-clad ninjas, for some reason all references to druids have been replaced with "mages" lest any semblance of the actual historic context seep through and just... really ridiculous. I don't have enough internet access just now nor quite the interest to look at its critical reviews but I hope it got the shellacking it deserved. I only got about halfway through before in-flight entertainment shut off (again, WTF Etihad, the entertainment system doesn't work until you're at cruising altitude and shuts down again as descent begins, leaving us sans entertainment for a good forty minutes at the beginning and end for no clear reason), and I do not feel any need to watch the rest of this film whose underlying idea seems to simply be "so we take a few key words from the story of king arthur and just cobble together from there a super CGI heavy fantasy drama from the cheapest script writer we can find."


   Will post about Paris itself in another entry.

aggienaut: (Numbat)

Wednesday, August 23rd, Melbourne, Australia - "Where are you from?" I ask the taxi driver in Melbourne, since he's mentioned his wife immigrating
   "Africa" he says as if that should be a satisfactory answer
   "Where in Africa?" I ask
   "East Africa" he says as if he doesn't know why I'm bothering to inquire further
   "Where in East Africa?"
   "Ethiopia" he says like it's an "I told you so" that it wouldn't mean anything to me
   "Where in Ethiopia?"
   "Addis Ababa" he says as if this is starting to get a little weird.
   "How do you like the new light rail in Addis?"
   "Oh. oh. .. Uh ... They should have repaired the roads first" I relish the look of shock in his eyes that I'm current on Addis happenings. Anyway it turns out he thinks the rail system is poorly planned. He thinks they should have improved the roads first. I think getting people off the roads and onto mass transit should be a priority in every big city.

   During my 14 hour overnight layover in Melbourne I crashed at the place of an American couple I know from the Americans in Melbourne facebook group.

Thursday, August 24th - Departed Melbourne for a (two?) hour flight to Sydney at 8am. Short layover there and then 15 hour flight to LAX. Flight very empty, had a whole row to myself (cue angels singing). Even though it was an entirely daytime flight they had everyone close all the windows and tured the lights way down to simulated night mode. I understand flights are more bearable if you're asleep and we bother flight attendants less when we're asleep but I hate it when they do that.
   Watched several not-very-memorable movies and The Accountant which I rather liked, it's like Rainman if Rainman happened to pick up being a badass cold blooded killer as a random hobby. Watched Episode 5 of the current season of Game of Thrones on my laptop and would have watched Episode 6 but apparently the version I downloaded turned out to be unreadable.

   Flight arrived late into LAX so I had only an hour to catch the continuing flight, and of course had to go through passport control, collect my luggage, go through customs, drop it at the transit luggage window, find ourselves popping out on the curb outside the terminal, go back through security again, and get to the gate. Those of us with flights in the next hour were given priority passes through passport control and customs but no help getting through security. My backpack got flagged for additional screening and as it sat getting ignored on the side table with fifteen minutes till my flight was supposed to LEAVE I implored a TSA agent if they could at all prioritize clearing my bag and they semed to relish giving me a very abrupt and cavalier "NOPE!!" I swear the US TSA is the worst and rudest in the world.
   Literally ran from there to my gate and found the aircraft had had a delayed arrival coming in from Sydney so it was still boarding .... it was my same plane!!!
   Also I was a bit confused to find the gate alternating listed destinations between "Managua" and "Atlanta." My ticket and itinerary hadn't listed Atlanta as a stop so this was the first I was aware I'd be going there.
   Also it was during this flight that I discovered the fatigue of this arduous journey had rendered me no longer able to read even with my reading glasses for more than five minutes at a time before my eyes hurt too much. Hopefully it was just the extraordinary fatigue but I also fear my eyesight it going fast. ):

   I don't know, some number of hours flight to Atlanta, also had empty seat beside me. It was only like a three hour flight but the guy with the window seat (I was the aisle) got up to use the bathroom like four times. Jesus people don't drink so much coffee, or whatever you're doing.
   Did have to change planes in Atlanta. Just enough time in Atlanta to get to the gate. I think there were only two of us from the LAX-ATL leg continuing on to ATL-Managua, if its not the same plane, not really the same passengers, I'm not sure why it even is "the same flight."
   This time didn't have an empty seat next to me, and having been traveling for over 65 hours, no longer able to read, no movie screens in this plane ... it was several hours of relative hell..


Managua, Nicaragua - first impression on stepping out of the aircraft door and being hit with the warm humid nighttime air (it was around 8pm) was that it smelled like a hedge. And then inside the terminal it somehow smelled like a winery. And out in front of the terminal it smelled like steaming spinach. Shuttle from the hotel picked me up for a humerously short trip to the hotel literally across the street.
   This area of town doesn't seem to have anything else in walking distance so anything I can't get at the hotel I trot across the street to the shops in the airport terminal.


Friday, August 25th - I had been recruited a few years ago for a project in Nicaragua I didn't end up doing, but I emailed the guy that runs that little organization before arriving and especially when I learned I'd have Friday free made plans to meet up with him. He happened to be going to the National Agricultural College just outside town for a beekeeping presentation being put on by a Dr Van Veen out of Costa Rica, so he picked me up in a pick up truck driven by a friend of his. He and I sat in the back -- Which I'd never actually done before since that's generally illegal in Western countries but it was really nice! Who needs a convertible when you can ride in the back of a pickup!
   The city doesn't seem to have any highrises that I've seen but kind of seems a vast sort of not quite suburban but, light-urbam? small urban? is there a word for this? Small cinderblock houses that barely have enough open space around them to call it a yard, but with trees and bougainvilleaa climbing the surrounding walls. We went down a bunch of residential roads rather than the bigger seemingly arterial road, I don't know if htat was to avoid traffic or what. There were a lot of little sort of bicycle-powered taxi vehicles where the driver sat behind a seat with room for two. The kind of thing you sometimes see on tourist boardwalks but this seemed to be a major source of local transport.

   Agricultural campus out outside of town to the north. Some thirty or so students in attendance in a building with lots of ceiling fans, while outside other students herded cattle past. It was pretty hot except directly under the fans. Presentation was in spanish so I could only barely get the gist of it by typing the words on the powerpoint slides into google translate. Seemed interesting, especially since he had a whole segment on the native stingless bees which I'd have loved to be able to understand.

   On our way back into town on the main highway traffic came to a complete and utter standstill. We were given Dr Van Veen and a colleague of his a ride to the airport so we were about anxious about this traffic. I'm told there was another highway they knew was also at a standstill and the only other way around would be an 80 mile detour. I don't know what's normal around here but I noticed a dark black plume of smoke had emerged from a nearby volcano, and it seemed ominous and possibly related but no one mentioned it so maybe not. After about an hour people had all gotten out of their cars and were talking to eachother and our driver got the down low of a secret route through back streets and we drove on the wrong side of the highway a few hundred yards (not a problem, no cars were coming from that way and plenty of others were doing the same as us) and drove into a narrow alley where we just barely barely fit after folding our mirrors in. Other cars had gone ahead of us and it seemed even more were coming behind, apparently word had just gotten out. There followed another interesting hour of proceeding down labyrinthine narrow back streets, sometimes having to back out of an impassible route. It was certainly interesting. Finally we got out on wide open back roads back out in countryside, where there were eerily few cars on the road, and always that thick black ominous plume of smoke ahead.

   But finally we came back into the city and actually got to the airport in time for the flight!!



   That evening I finally downloaded the most recent (Episode 6) episode of Game of Thrones and, not to spoilerize it, but I felt like it was markedly more badly written than previous episodes/seasons, in my opinion. Like nothing surprising happened, and that cliche thing where you think a main character has definitely died but it turns out they didn't happened several times (also happened in Episode 5 a lot). Later I came across an Onion article saying they basically no longer are following any script at all so I guess I wasn't the only one.
   After this my laptop battery was pretty much used up and I once again am unable to charge it since I still don't have a universal plug converter for the Aus plug on my laptop and now it needs to plug into US shaped sockets here!

Saturday, August 27th - The plan was that I'd meet with the country director on this morning and find out what the plan was. When he arrived I was surprised to find him to be a young fellow looking to be in his mid 20s -- usually the country directors are older and I imagine the job description calls for a masters degree and ten years of management or something like that, so I assumed he must be a real whiz-kid. As it turns out, I have no reason to doubt his competence but I guess it's just that they don't actually have an actual country director at the moment at he's the senior staffmember (of two, where there should be four) and therefore acting country director. Found out I'm not going to the Field till Monday. On past projects I might be upset to be cooling my heels for three full days before going out but I felt and feel like I needed the time to recover from that ordeal of a trip here.
   Apparently I'll be going north and it sounds like a nice area. I'm looking forward to it!

   I was also introduced to two volunteers who he had jut brought back from the field. An older woman (fifties ish?) and a younger woman who had actually just a few months previously finished her Peace Corps posting here in Nicaragua. They were working together on some marketing related coconut oil project.
   Spent most of the rest of the day with the women, in particular the former Peace Corps Volunteer (Eliana) was a wealth of knowledge about Nicaragua.

   Also of note, in the afternoon while I was swimming at the hotel swimming pool I made my 101st rescue. Having been a lifeguard through high school, I am forever imbued with an urge to yell at kids for running on the deck by the pool or diving in in the shallow end, and catching the merest hint of the distinctive jerky wallowed flail of a distressed swimmer out of the corner of my eye grabs my full attention and sets me to red alert. A "distressed swimmer" (ie someone who is attempting to drown), isn't like they are in TV with big splashes and calls for help, and as is too often the case even though she was in many people's field of view no one else seemed to take notice. I was swimming laps at the time and got to her just as her head disappeared below water, pulled her up, put her arms on the pool edge which was actually just right there, she slipped off again, put her back and held her there ... and several minutes later her family actually noticed and hurried over, got her out. Another misconception perpetuated from Baywatch: people NEVER shower you with gratitude for rescuing them. I think something that sounded vaguely grateful, in Spanish of course, but it might have just been "I just need a minute" or something.

   Last night at 11pm, an hour after I'd gone to bed, there was a pounding on my door like a god damn stormtrooper was there. As I pulled on some pants and opened the door I found someone from the hotel bar trying to explain to me I had to pay for the margarita I had had that afternoon that I thought I'd put on the room tab. I don't know why they couldn't have made it more clear at the time that I needed to pay it off that afternoon, or couldn't sort it out when I checked out like normal hotels, nor do I understand why this hotel seems to have nearly no english speaking staff despite being the premier tourist hotel in the capital. I found this nocturnal payment demand quite irksome. I'd complain to the front desk but... even the front desk guy doesn't speak English quite fluently enough that I'm confident I could make my complaint clear to him.


Sunday, August 28th - The two other volunteers left this morning and it turns out the older one was borrowing a laptop from the Organization, so now I'm borrowing the powercord from that laptop. Just taking it easy today, but starting to get my fill of "taking it easy" and really looking forward to shipping out for the field tomorrow!!


PS: I almost forgot, but for posterity, I find it's often interesting to recall what world events are going on at the time, because at the time it feels contemporaneous events are indelibly linked but of course they are not. So for the record, lots more people fled Trump's White House in the last week due to his bizarre support for white supremists, and just the other day he apparently pardoned the controvercial Arizona ex-sheriff Joe Arpaio and even a lot of Republicans seem pretty upset that he skipped the usual review process, that this seems to condone racial discrimination, and that Arpaio being a friend of his this seems pretty shameless abuse of power. Every week there seems to be more opinion articles claiming "this is finally impeachmentworthy."

aggienaut: (no rioting redux)



   If I may be so bold, I'd like to combine two fairly unrelated things in this entry. First I just wanted to post the pictures above and below of Cato posing particularly dramatically. And as long as I'm posting I've been wanting to rant a little bit about the Viking television series so I'm going to go ahead and do that. (Though I'll point out that viking cats are definitely a thing, we can call Cato "Bjornekatt Loðstjärt."(Bear-cat shaggy-butt))

   Now if I have a bunch of criticisms of the Vikings show it's not because I loathe and despise it but because vikings are near and dear to my heart and the show is almost excellent, except for a few things that really grate upon me, which is why I need to get it off my chest.
   I don't intend to include any spoilers in here except for maybe general comments on the personalities of main characters.

   (1) First of all, worst of all, that friggen "seer" is totally fantasy cliche and stolen whole cloth from the movie 300. I like that supernatural things occasionally happen, but I prefer it when they're portrayed kind of ambiguously like it could have just been a coincidence or someone's imagination, but this permanent character who doesn't look like a realistic normal human, doesn't act like one, and I cant' forget that I saw him looking and acting the same way in 300 is just a huge affront to my willing suspension of disbelief and enjoyment of the film.
   (2) What's with the awful haircuts? I googled around about the historical accuracy of the series before writing this and found some stupid puff pieces about how "yes they did have hair braids like that!" ... conveniently ignoring that I'm prrrrretty sure no one could be bothered to painstakingly shave fashionable portions of their head with the tools at hand (which is to say knives and water that would have to be heated over a fire). I feel like in later seasons they toned this down but in the first season it looked like a bunch of bikers with too much time on their hands escaped from hair design school. Also, it's one thing to have it shaved clean but Ragnar's son Bjorne looks like he has his hair shaved evenly at like a no 4 setting on a clippers, which would also be very hard to maintain without, you know, a clippers.
   (3) The immortality of main characters. It's a classic failing of MOST series that eventually you come to realize none of the main characters will ever die. Without giving too much away, several times main characters appear to be killed in battle, shot up with arrows, hacked and then run over by horses, limp corpse carried away... then it turns out they're alive! And walking talking frolicking about in the next scene. Instead of being on the edge of my seat when it looks like a main characters is about to die in battle, as you'd think they'd want the audience to feel, I just roll my eyes and when sure enough it turns out they're actually alive I groan aloud -- not because I specifically want any of the characters in question to die so much as just, come on man.
   (4) the world revolves around them -- it's also a weakness in a series when you start to feel like there's no world outside what's presently on set, and that they're the most important people in the world. In particular, when the viking king comes and hangs out for most of a season or two and has no retainers, seemingly nothing better to do, it seemed pretty odd to me. Doesn't he have at least a town of his own, and I don't know, a best friend? He just floats around like the secondary character he is and it starts to feel like they haven't filled out the rest of the viking world at all.
   (5) I really think they should have cast said king as Ragnar instead of the guy they did. He actually does seem to have the force of presence expected. The guy playing Ragnar seems like he's trying to channel Johnny Depp but it doesn't work for him. He doesn't have a forceful presence, he has a weird retreating twitching not-making-eye-contact not making decisions presence that doesn't seem to me to fit the part.
   (6) Ragnar Lodbroke means "Ragnar shaggy pants," WHERE ARE HIS SHAGGY PANTS
   (7) The tattoos. Did you know, there IS one reference to vikings "being covered in green drawings," by the Arab diplomat Ibn Fadlan who encountered a group of Varangrians (that is to say Norsemen who had settled in what is now Russia) in Bulgaria. Being as this is the only reference in any record, it is far more likely they picked it up in Russia (there's Siberian tribes known to tattoo -- seriously check out these cool tattoos) than that somehow no one in Europe ever thought to mention it and no tattoo implements have survived among the many oddments that have (I call this occam's tattoo needle).
   (8) This doesn't really bother me like the other things, but while I'm mentioning things, despite the two human sacrifices in the series being portrayed as voluntary, and indeed the priests refusing to take a non-voluntary sacrifice, and there are historical references and evidence of sacrifices, there is no historical reference or evidence of a single voluntary sacrifice.
   (9) Cato reminds me that there's no cats. Hmm that's a good point there really aren't.

   But other than the above points I must say I do find it rather enjoyable. I do really appreciate that they make a lot of references to the sagas and historical events. Presently once a week my friend Billie and I get together and I bring a bottle of mead and we watch a few episodes.

aggienaut: (Star Destroyer)

   So I've been anticipating this new Star Wars movie as much as anyone, I'm a classic example of one of those people who was a "star wars nerd" "before it was cool," (like 5th/6th grade) thought the three prequels were utter crap, all that. But to my horror I realized I was flying to Australia immediately prior to the movie release!!! OH NOES!!
   So yesterday I saw the movie by myself, like a loser ): But it doubled as a good thing to do while on my own in Melbourne since it got me out of the cold (it was 105 the other day and I-wish-I-brought-my-jacket weather the next, they weren't kidding about "four seasons in a day in Melbourne!"), especially since I've been fighting a cold ):

   Anyway before we get the the spoiler break I've just got to say I heard a song I really liked in the commercials that played preceding the movie:



   I really like both the sound of it and it's theme of a seemingly good person with that symbolic "red right hand." And this somewhat dark song was playing in the background of a tourism promotional thing for some region of Australia, showing people frolicking through hayfields! And I think I liked the way tehy synthesized it for that commercial even better, I wish I could find the commercial itself! lol.

   Anyway, on to our feature presentation, ladies and gentlemen, the spoiler-curtain please



Spoiler Curtain )

aggienaut: (Numbat)

Sunday, August 23rd - The day before the trip I found myself particularly stressed, not so much about packing so much as a number of things that needed to be sorted out before I left. Among other things, I bought my tickets for the October trip to East Africa. The group in Tanzania I've been planning to work with, the main contact has been extremely difficult to get ahold of and when I finally had a friend in Nairobi call him (he always asks me to call him in the afternoon, which is the middle the night for me) he apparently said "call in September" to find out if everything is ready for the project ... which as you can imagine increased my frustration with trying to plan it. But then I got a nice email from the Beekeeping cooperative of Pemba Island, the northernmost of the Zanzibar islands. I had contacted them as a backup plan to Tanzania but they seem so much easier to work with...

   I'm thinking of trying to fit both in though.

   I took most of the evening off though because my dear friend Asli was passing through LAX with a seven hour layover, on her way to Fiji to take up a position as a third mate on a ship there. It's funny because last time I was her was a little less than a year ago when I myself had a ten hour layover in Istanbul.
   It was interesting to note that for her to legally immigrate or even visit the states would be a huge process, but, without even dealing with the US embassy or consulate she was able to get a transit visa on a ticket from Istanbul to Fiji, get stamped for a "transit visa" on arrival and walk right out of the terminal to disappear into Los Angeles.
   As it happens of course she has no intention to illegally immigrate and to do so would throw away her huge investment in time and money in her merchant marine licensing (US authorities who are reading this please take note and keep it in mind when granting her a tourist visa eventually!)

   We had just time to drive down to the Santa Monica Pier and stroll about there for a bit before rushing back to the airport. Unfortunately didn't have time for In-N-Out as we'd hoped -- the line was around the building. I feel well satisfied though that we made the most of the time, the pier and surroundings were suitably emblematic of the LA area.



Monday, August 24th - Got up at 5:30 for my 8:45am flight. And then began packing ;D
   Last time I was really freaked out because I didn't seem to have forgotten anything, which just seemed wrong. Well I don't have that worry this time. Despite distinctly remembering unplugging my phone charger and picking up the solar phone charger that would have been so useful on this trip, I can't find them in my luggage. Very irritating, I guess I must have set them down somewhere between retrieval and putting them in the luggage. ):
   And before anyway says "you wouldn't have forgotten anything if you had packed the day before! I'll point out that I needed my phone to be charging that night so the one tihng I forgot I couldn't have packed earlier anyway.
   As it happens I have another charger that's for the in-country phone I've been provided with, but it doesn't seem to charge my phone very fast, charging overnight last night (in country now) didn't even get it about 80%.
   Also it means I can't transfer pictures from my phone to my computer. :-/

In Flight Movie Review Intermission!
The Hobbit III: Battle of Five Armies - D+ I loved the Hobbit book, though granted I was in elementary school when I read it, but I'm going to wildly guess there was just a chapter or two dedicated to this battle, and there's a reason for that. While an important event if you dedicate an entire novel / feature-length-film to one battle, we've really gotta care about it and/or it needs to be done extremely well. You could make a movie about Gettysberg or Waterloo or such, but I think almost any entirely fictional battle is just going to be a lot of pointless killing in movie form. And that's what this was, CGI orcs and dwarves and elves throwing eachother around for 2+ hours. On top of this the orc commander suddenly appears on top of another mountain that wasn't there before, and though it's snowy on top everyone seems easily able to teleport there from the battleground and/or see what's going on there? Or how about when characters trekked to some other fortress presumably hundreds of miles away and returned, also during the battle? I'm not talking about the wizards going to renamed Dol Guldor in the south, but that made up place in the West. Anyway, I thought it was pretty terrible, probably the only reason I didn't give it an F was out of my tremendous respect for JRR Tolkien's original story.
The Water Diviner - A and I don't give many As! Russell Crowe as an Australian farmer and water diviner sets off to look for three sons, all of whom failed to return from the Battle of Gallipoli four years prior. Also his wife commmits suicide, which I guess really bummed him out, but obviously opening it up for him to fall in love with a Turkish woman, which I'm not even calling a spoiler because who wouldnt' see that a mile away. Anyway for some reason, despite not having had any relatives involved to my knowledge, the Battle of Gallipoli always seems particularly poignant to me, maybe it's because I lived in Australia, have been to Gallipoli, and fell in love with a Turkish woman myself (and whom I'd seen just the day before). Anyway I think the movie was well done, and did a good job of portraying the Turks of the era as a rich and dignified culture torn between a disintegrating empire and Turkish nationalism.
Gunman - B- A solid running-around-shooting-pepole of the "trying to find out why they're trying to kill me" variety. Noteworthy aspect to comment on, in the beginning the protagonist and his compatriots are working as private security for aid agencies in Congo, and then most of the action occurs eight years later, where we find him digging water wells in the Congo (an interesting random parallel to the Water Diviner, which involves some well digging), and all of his compatriots are now filthy rich running their own aid agencies. I had no idea aid work was the path to the swanky life! ;D


Tuesday, August 25th -Other than those movies, nothing much to remark on about the flights. Orange County -> Minneapolis -> Paris CDG (where they still don't know how to queue for security check, but I got randomly waved into the flight crew line, where I think security was much more laid back and friendly) -> Sierra Leone (didn't de-plane) to Conakry. Arrived in Conakry at 17:30, which if I'm doing the math right is 25.75 hours after my plane had taken off in California. It took another hour and a half to wind through the narrow crowded streets of Conakry to my hotel at the end of the peninsula.


Wednesday, August 26th - For my own reference, this is the Golden Plaza Hotel that they've put me in this time. It has a nice restaurant in it, the food is downright good, and the internet works better than it does at home (that being said, it's been down this last hour, but hey). Generator kicks right on when the power goes out, AC works ... but my room is a cell with no window. There's a window, on the side wall of an adjoining utility closet which I have a curtained window that looks into. So the level of outdoor light and fresh air in here is dungeon status. And the bed takes up most of the space in the room so it's very dungeonesque. I'd ask to be put in the hotel I was in last time, which is right around the corner ... but internet is lifeblood and it mostly works here. When I get back into the city I'm definitely requesting a room with an actual window though. I don't care if it gets street noise, that's preferable to being in the Bastille here.

   Speaking of when I return, usually there's a day or two of lollygagging about upon my return to the capitol, which is generally not very fun because, like today, I end up with nothing to do but sit in my cell. But I google image searched the islands off the coast here and ... wow! And then looked at the tripadvisor comments on them and they're totally doable in a day trip! I'm so doing that when I get back!

   But back to the present, today I spent way too many hours cooped up in this cell. Oh I went out and walked around a bit, but this town isn't entirely safe even in broad daylight (last time I was year one of the other volunteers got picked up by some soldiers allegedly for photographing buildings he wasn't supposed to photograph, and they took him back to their barracks to pressure him into bribing them. Though ultimately they let him go not terribly worse for the wear, I'm still particularly leery of soldiers in this town. I did find my favorite Turkish place from last time I was hear and had lunch there.

   Also exchanged money for 8300 Guinean Franks to the dollar, thus making me once again a millionaire (1.8 million franks to my name at the moment). I always find it novel that the official exchange rate (7300:1) is just an average and you can actually beat it. In industrialized European countries I don't know how one can do that, usually everywhere that'll exchange money will only do so at a rate significantly advantageous to the broker in comparison to the exchange rate, but dealing with individual money exchangers in Africa I've frequently been able to significantly beat the rate (and by me, I mean the savvy Winrock staffmember assisting me).



   It is presently Wednesday evening. Tomorrow morning I head up country to the project site in the field. Immediately prior to beginning one of these projects it always feels a bit like walking to the front of a big lecture hall with no idea what you're about to say. Getting to the podium, turning around and seeing all eyes on you ... and you just start talking. By which I mean, it's impossible to plan what I'm going to say/teach/do, every situation is different and I won't know until I get there. But thousands of dollars have been spent to get me here so there's certainly pressure. And I don't feeeeel like I have anything that valuable locked away in my head to share. I think I would have been more terrified before my first project if I'd known what I was getting into. I think I would have been more terrified on my second project, except I knew by some miracle I had made it through the first one ... seemingly with flying colors. It still marvels me that it works.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 08:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »