aggienaut: (helicopters)

   It appears that today the official government of Somalia, supported by Ethiopia, has taken control of Mogadishu (Somalia's largist city) for the first time in 16 years.

   It began 8 days ago (Dec 20th) )with forces fo the Islamic Courts Union (ICU), the fundamentalist Islamic faction that controlled most of Somalia including Mogadishu, advancing on Baidoa, the headquarters of the Transitional Federal Government (TFG). Baidoa is 159 miles NE of Mogadishu. ICU spokespersons predicted a swift victory. Ethiopian reinforcements, including T-55 tanks quickly joined the battle, leading to intense fighting for several days. News stories seem to include a lot of claims of ICU victories, either of the battle as a whole or over various outlying villages, stories which are then refuted by local residents or journalists on the ground. On Christmas Day there were reports of dozens of Ethiopian tanks moving south toward Jowhar, potentially flanking the ICU positions, and on the 26th ICU forces reportedly began fleeing from the Battle of Baidoa, abondoning their heavy weapons.

   Meanwhile, some 250 miles to the northeast, Ethiopian forces supported another anti-ICU faction, the militia of Galmudug province, in pushing ICU forces back into the neighbouring province of Galgadud, in fighting on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day in the Battle of Brandiradly.

   Also between Dec 24-25th, Ethiopian forces retook Beledweyne 60 miles to the north of Baidoa. Last August ICU forces had taken the city and the TFG-appointed governor had fled to Ethiopia. On retaking the city, the former governor declared that now that the town was liberated it would be once again legal to chew khat, and trucks of khat rolling in the next day were met with cheering. (Maybe its just a really serious "legalize it" campaigne?)

   Yesterday morning the last major ICU stronghold of Jowhar fell after only a few hours of early morning fighting. The former mayor of Jowhar reportedly led the attack while wearing a "I Love Jowhar" t-shirt.

   Yesterday government forces arrived on the outskirts of Mogadishu, but halted their advance - "We are not going to fight for Mogadishu to avoid civilian casualties...Our troops will surround Mogadishu until they surrender," stated a TFG ambassador. However, already ICU troops were being seen changing out of their uniforms and local tribal militias were changing allegiancies and reversing ICU policies. Earlier today the ICU ceased all resistence in Mogadishu, and the TFG forces began securing the city.


   ICU forces still control much land outside the combat areas, it will be interesting to see if in the coming days these lands revert to TFG control or hold out. I am guessing they will at least change their allegiance and assimilate into the local tribal militias.

   The UN Security Council discussed asking for a cease fire but ultimately declined to do so, seeing as the "good guys" appear to be winning.

   Now the real question is, seeing as this all started with the ICU advancing on the TFG with high hopes of victory, was this all just an extremely successful counterattack, or a premeditated operation which fooled the ICU completely?

aggienaut: (asucd)

   I'm sitting in the ASUCD Senate meeting at the moment. So far "today" I've been in Senate meetings for 7.5 hours, and going strong! About an hour ago I made my farewell speech here. I'll try to recreate it as best I can in a subsequent LJ entry.

   Anyway, I was at the impeachment hearing for ASUC Berkeley Chief Justice Banerjee last night, which went until 5:48am.
   I think the whole thing is really summed up by an event that happened towards the beginning. After going back and forth a bit, and then consulting with the chairperson, it was announced that both the Defence & Prosecution had agreed that one of the charges should be dropped. This still had to be approved by a vote of the Senate however. Despite the fact that both parties agreed that the charge should be dropped, a sizable portion of the Senate STILL voted against dropping it. Clearly, some people weren't concerned with any sense of justice.
   Ironically, of the two witnesses the Prosecution called up, one had been convicted of perjury by the Judicial Council last year, and one had been prominantly noted as being a totally evasive witness in a case last year. So you have a perjuror & an evasive witness testifying against the Chief Justice ... needless to say the perjuror (from some analyses I've seen since), was in fact misleading in his answers if not outright lying again, and the evasive witness definitely demonstrated her skills at evasion.
   And incidently, the Judicial Rules of Procedure, which the Senate is to follow during impeachment hearings, clearly state that someone convicted of perjury cannot testify in future cases (unless both sides agree, which they didn't here). The chairman misunderstood the purpose of this rule and said that the perjuror "was only banned from Judicial Council, but THIS is Senate" (paraphrased), but the point of course isn't that the Council doesn't want to see him anymore, but that he's clearly an unreliable witness!!

   Anyway, not to be morbid by saying I enjoyed it, but I found it very interesting. I especially enjoyed meeting all their justices in person. The justices that were assisting in Banerjees defense welcomed me onto their team as if I was one of their own and I greatly enjoyed getting a chance to work with them so closely.

   Anyway, there was no doubt that Banerjee destroyed the case against her. The Prosecution during their closing arguments even said something along the lines of "so, yeah we're obviously not lawyers, and we probably didn't do a very good job presenting our case, but believe us she should be impeached!!" and this was echoed by some pro-impeachment senators during deliberations (which fortunately were open, after some implication in the past few days that it might have been closed), who even went so far as to say the impeachment trial was "unfair" because Chief Justice Banerjee had an unfair advantage in actually knowing the judicial procedures and being lawyerly.
   Don't get me wrong, I went with an open mind that maybe there were salient charges against Banerjee. And a few times it sounded like the prosecution was onto something ... until the defense devastatingly showed how misleading the nuanced account just given by the Prosecution was. In the end, I can't think of a single charge that had any weight left in it, but the final vote was 12 in favour of impeachment, 8 against. Since a two-thirds majority was required to carry the removal, it failed.

   Additionally I'd like to thank Brent Laabs & Laabs' Friend for driving, and our Justice Coady, as well as IAC's Max Mikalonis for coming along and staying till the bitter end with me. It was also nice to meet bloggist Beetlebeat and (one of?) the Calstuff bloggers. Someone I met was very enthusiastic to meet "the Emosnail blogger," which made me feel kind of famous. (= I'd also like to note that I was particularly pleased with Squelch! Senator Wasserman's performance.

Miscellenea: The ASUC Berkeley Senators have brass placards! We all have cardboard ones here. Their justices don't have placards at all. Also, the mythical "point of clarification" used by Senate up here (which allows you to say whatever you want whenever you want) is mirrored by "points of personal priviledge" down there (which as intended by Robert's Rules are for random things like "I can't hear the speaker" or "its too cold in here"). ASUCB: get your justices placards and clamp down on these points of personal priviledge. ASUCD: lets all get brass placards. Especially the Court since we'll all be using them for years. (=


Quotes
   Banerjee: "Objection!," Chair: "There's no grounds for an objection here, what he said doesn't even make sense!!"
   Prosecutor "Objection, Leading!" Chair: "She hasn't asked anything yet!"


Related

   Reporting Live - Berkeley student paper Daily Cal actually publishes an article on the impeachment while the impeachment is still ongoing.
   Official Newspaper Article - The Daily Cal reports. Also notice how short their URLs are compared to the long ugly Cal Aggie URLs.
   Beetlebeat Long Version - account of the impeachment
   Beetlebeat Short Version
   People for the Ethical Treatment of Sonya Banerjee - Facebook group
   [I'm sure a number of people will blog about the events, please bring these entries to my attention for linking]

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6 7 89101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 07:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »