E.M.O.S.N.A.I.L. Annual Review 2005
May. 26th, 2005 01:45 pm As it has now been more than a year since obisan69 was kind enough to get Emosnail a paid account, and therefore a year since I first posted the Emosnail review poll, I thought I ought to post it again and see how things have changed in the interceding year.
You will be asked to evaluate the following categories on a 1-12 scale. Consider six to be average for your friends-list. In general 12 is the more advisable condition. For Unbiasedness, consider 1 to be biased like the UCD MUN Secretary-General counting ballots, and 12 to be the opposite of this. On lengthiness, 12 does NOT denote the most lengthiness, rather 12 indicates the most optimal length. At this time the poll does not measure whether you are otherwise indicating entries are too long or too short, I'm assuming numbers less than 12 indicate too much length however, so if you feel otherwise you may want to note that. Relevancy describes the degree to which you find the entries worth reading, as compared to average on your friends list; similarly amusement describes the relative degree you find the entries amusing.
[Poll #501304]
Previously on Emosnail
Two Years Ago Today: Berkeley Adventure - showing great foresight I manage to avoid Tobin's House of Moral Depravity and instead sleep on some random person's couch.
Year Ago Today: DMUNC 2004 - and polling favourites